|
[Sponsors] |
August 29, 2011, 06:35 |
BlockMeshDict geometry resolvement Problem
|
#1 |
New Member
Levent Aymelek
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi all,
i am trying to mesh a simple domain. I tried different mesh sizes in my Blockmeshdict. But strangely with some parameters althoung the total number of meshes are much more higher then the others geometry is not resolved at all... its keeping the wrong cells... (Note: i am always giving the same location(lover left corner) in "LocationInMesh") Does anyone have any idea? blockmesh (5 5 5) 5_5_5.jpg blockmesh (8 8 8) 8_8_8.jpg blockmesh (20 20 20) 20_20_20.jpg |
|
August 30, 2011, 10:27 |
|
#2 |
Member
Goncalo Pedro
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Victoria, British Columbia
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi
Seems like your geometry is allowing cell leak. Is it water tight? Sometimes, better refinement is a good way to find leaks in geometry. Goncalo |
|
August 31, 2011, 06:21 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Levent Aymelek
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi,
thanks for reply. I am pretty sure that its water tight but ofcourse worth to check. But if its not water tight doesnt openfoam supposed to give the same result for each blockmesh options? Thanks Levent |
|
August 31, 2011, 09:40 |
|
#4 |
Member
Goncalo Pedro
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Victoria, British Columbia
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Levent
snappyHexMesh will subdivide the object's surface by whatever factor you prescribe. If you start off with a finer blockmesh, your surface mesh will end up being smaller. Is this a free-floating bluff body, or a wall mounted structure? Goncalo |
|
August 31, 2011, 09:46 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Levent Aymelek
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 15 |
to be honest i have no idea what are free-floating bluff body, or a wall mounted structure.
But if my mesh is finer in (20 20 20 ) than (8 8 8). finer mesh supposed to give better results because surface mesh is finer, no? |
|
August 31, 2011, 09:57 |
|
#6 |
Member
Goncalo Pedro
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Victoria, British Columbia
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Levent
I think your problem is not so much the blockmesh as the snappyHexMesh step. Want kind of geometry are you trying to mesh? Of the 3 images you showed, it seems to me that the second one is closest to what you would like to see. Goncalo |
|
August 31, 2011, 10:06 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Levent Aymelek
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 15 |
thats right.. second one is what i want to see.. but i want to understand the fact there... why i can get the geometry with (8 8 8) mesh but not with a finer one like (20 20 20).
|
|
August 31, 2011, 11:46 |
|
#8 |
Member
Goncalo Pedro
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Victoria, British Columbia
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Levent
snappy basically first refines the cells at surfaces and then removes internal cells. If it detects a way into a solid body, it won't remove that internal mesh. Is the structure attached to a boundary created by blockMesh? |
|
September 1, 2011, 09:00 |
|
#9 |
New Member
Levent Aymelek
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi Goncalo,
actually they intersect... to see the mesh clearly i defined the domain in z direction narrower then the geometry itself... there is still no leak on the geometry surface but this intersection may cause the problem... i will check and inform u guys about the result. |
|
September 1, 2011, 09:24 |
|
#10 |
New Member
Levent Aymelek
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi again,
i tried to enlarge the domain so that nothing would intersect with the geometry. It works... thanks a lot! |
|
September 1, 2011, 10:27 |
|
#11 |
New Member
Levent Aymelek
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 15 |
i am mistaken..... it does not work... still works for (8 8 8) but not (10 10 10)
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ICEM] [FLUENT] 2D Geometry problem when exporting to Fluent - Unwanted walls | MikeTichondrius | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | February 9, 2011 14:31 |
How can FLUENT be used to model a transient problem with changing geometry? | Fascal | FLUENT | 0 | June 30, 2010 16:21 |
[GAMBIT] problem in importing Pro Engineer geometry :-( | arash_7444 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 3 | June 14, 2010 03:06 |
GAMBIT, CAD import, clean up geometry problem | Nuray Kayakol | FLUENT | 1 | December 30, 2007 12:43 |
Geometry setup for phase change problem | Fred G. Kang | Main CFD Forum | 1 | October 14, 1998 12:41 |