CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

Wrong boundary conditions?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 25, 2011, 06:13
Default Wrong boundary conditions?
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
thomas.g is on a distinguished road
Hello Foamers,

I want to simulate the flow through a heat exchanger and have already implemented the geometry in OpenFoam.
One part of the heat exchanger looks like the letter U. In this area I got the attached result. The picture shows a slide through the pipe.
I am confused about the flow pattern, because I expected an increase of the velocity at the edge of the curved tube.
Can this be caused by the boundary conditions?
Simulation with: SimpleFoam + k-epsilon for turbulence

Boundary conditions:


U:
boundaryField
{

inlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (1.088250128 0 0);
}

outlet
{
type zeroGradient;
}


Walls
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (0 0 0);
}

symmetric
{
type symmetryPlane;
}

frontAndBack
{
type empty;
}
}


p:
dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0];

internalField uniform 101.3;

boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type zeroGradient;
}

outlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 101.3;
}

Walls
{
type zeroGradient;
}

symmetric
{
type symmetryPlane;
}

frontAndBack
{
type empty;
}
}

The frontAndBack-Patch is not in use anymore.

Thanks for your help and good ideas,

Thomas
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Simulation.jpg (54.4 KB, 48 views)
thomas.g is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 28, 2011, 08:17
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Alex
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: München
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 15
al_pr is on a distinguished road
Hello Thomas,

I am a beginner in OpenFOAM but for me the boundary conditions look okay and I also agree to you that the results look strange. I would would expect an increase of the velocity. The only thing is, I would change the pressure outlet boundary condition to "$internalField" than "uniform 101.23".

What is your convergence criteria and the "symmetric" part of your geometry?

Regards,

Alex
al_pr is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boundary Conditions Thomas P. Abraham Main CFD Forum 20 July 7, 2013 06:05
MRFSimpleFoam: wrong boundary conditions on rotating walls cves OpenFOAM Bugs 3 May 3, 2010 04:38
CFX doesn't continue calculation... mactech001 CFX 6 November 15, 2009 22:25
A problem about setting boundary conditions lyang Main CFD Forum 0 September 19, 1999 19:29
Boundary Conditions Jan Ramboer Main CFD Forum 11 August 16, 1999 09:59


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:15.