|
[Sponsors] |
Can anybody please check my boundary conditions? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 3, 2011, 10:06 |
|
#41 |
New Member
BR
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 17 |
do you use simpleFoam?
did you try to do without turbulence models? |
|
August 3, 2011, 10:08 |
|
#42 |
Senior Member
|
I only tried simpleFoam with turbulence models.
|
|
August 3, 2011, 10:10 |
|
#43 |
New Member
BR
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 17 |
First : Try using no turbulence model. It will be easier to debug.
Second : I cant understand why your k value is 0 everywhere and epsilon value is 1.78 ?? Any particular reason behind this? |
|
August 3, 2011, 10:13 |
|
#44 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Thank you to both of you! |
||
August 3, 2011, 10:17 |
|
#45 |
New Member
BR
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 17 |
Just for your reference in the future simulations please look into
http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Turbu...ary_conditions to set initial conditions for k , epsilon and omega.. Have fun |
|
August 3, 2011, 12:23 |
|
#46 |
Senior Member
|
Thank you!
|
|
August 3, 2011, 23:53 |
|
#47 | |
New Member
Sukanta Rakshit
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
This is because of 2 reasons 1. If at the outlet U is fixed at 30 m/s, pressure will be depend on what fluid you are using. At steady state, both inlet and outlet pressure should be in the same range (not much difference) because its constant velocity simulation. 2. If U and p are inconsistent then you will get inconsistent solution. More iterations you will run, higher the velocity inside the domain you will get. This is because flow will bounce between two Dirichlet boundaries with inconsistent pressure. If you are thinking of setting pressure in either of the boundary, then you have to keep the velocity floating at that boundary (or you should define some physical value). Results with flow over a cylinder with fixed velocity (U=30 m/s) and floating pressure can be seen in the attached images. Yes, i agree with Ramakrishnan. Turbulent properties should be defined correctly and solving without them will help in identifying the problem. |
||
August 4, 2011, 07:58 |
|
#48 |
Senior Member
|
The same case won't converge with icoFoam… Why?
|
|
August 4, 2011, 20:40 |
|
#49 |
New Member
Sukanta Rakshit
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 17 |
||
August 5, 2011, 05:24 |
|
#50 |
Senior Member
|
What should I check about the ddtSchemes?
|
|
August 5, 2011, 05:48 |
|
#51 |
Senior Member
Mohammad
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Shiraz, Iran
Posts: 108
Rep Power: 16 |
hi,
as I had ran similar cases a lot, I think best condition is: 1- domain should be large enough and cell height at surface of cylinder should be small enough 2- boundary conditions should be as follows: U: inlet: fixedValue, value=30,0,0 outlet: zeroGradient cylinder: fixedValue,value=0,0,0 P: inlet: zeroGradient outlet: fixedValue,value=0 cylinder: zeroGradient k and omega: inlet: fixedValue,value=...(depend on your turbulence - you can use turbulence intensity instead of fixedValue also) outlet: zeroGradient cylinder:fixedValue,value=0 (for k) fixedValue,value=a large number depending surface roughness(for omega) 3- discretization schemes should be limitedlinear or upwind (linear scheme makes fake pressure waves) and about the pressure: most of CFD codes use gauge pressure to reduce errors because abs.pressure is usually a large number and its gradient is small, so roundoff errors increase with abs. pressure as calculation pressure. for incompressible cases as in N.S. and continuity eqn. there is no P, but just gradient of P, so any value for outlet pressure gives same result but a shift in pressure values in domain. and about icoFoam, it is a piso based solver and should be ran with small timesteps. as your case has unsteadiness (because of vortex shedding and separation unsteadiness) you cant reach a steady converged solution but you can have converged unsteady solution after a reasonable time advance. I hope these helps, Mohammad |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Impinging Jet Boundary Conditions | Anindya | Main CFD Forum | 25 | February 27, 2016 13:58 |
CFX does not continue | Shafiul | CFX | 10 | February 17, 2011 08:57 |
Proper Pressure Boundary Conditions for Buoyant Flow | mchurchf | OpenFOAM | 0 | March 25, 2010 13:16 |
Cell check and Boundary check errors | AB | Siemens | 4 | October 28, 2004 14:04 |
Please help with flow around car modelling! | Tudor Miron | CFX | 17 | March 19, 2004 20:23 |