|
[Sponsors] |
February 14, 2011, 05:44 |
attachdetach turbulence b.c.
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 140
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Foamers,
I ve a problem to set up a case with topological changes (OpenFoam 1.6-ext). I like to simulate a spark ignited engine with a pent roof, including valves. So far I managed to adapt a mesh motion class to my requirements. In order to close and open the valves a small curtain surface around the valve is introduced by the attachdetach meshModifier. The mesh works fine. I ve tested it with a pure mesh motion solver, but with egineDyMFoam (adjusted to the engineTopChangerMesh class) it doesn’t t work. Segmentation fault when the turbulence->correct() is called. Till this step everything works fine. Remark: Without the attachdetach meshModifier( turbulence on) it works and with attachdetach (turbulence off) it works as well. It seems that I ve a problem with the boundary conditions of the attachdetach faces for the turbulence model. Furthermore, with 1.5-dev it works without a problem. There, the turbulence model doesn’t t ask for boundary conditions for the attachdetach faces but in 1.6-ext it does. Does anyone has used the attachdetach approach in 1.6-ext so far with a turbulence model? Best regards Peter |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
B.C. for turbulence | prashant.801 | FLUENT | 0 | October 8, 2010 11:51 |
Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!! | Wen Long | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 15, 2009 10:52 |
Recommended values on turbulence B.C. | Jihwan | Siemens | 2 | August 10, 2005 08:45 |
¡¾Q¡¿inflow turbulence B.C. of k-epsilon model? | David | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 10, 2003 11:54 |