|
[Sponsors] |
November 6, 2010, 15:10 |
vacuum model
|
#1 |
Member
Daniel
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: California
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi There DSMC folk -
I was thinking about trying to modify one of the wall interaction models to make it a vacuum boundary. I don't have a lot of c++ experience, but in a Fortran90 dsmc code that I have used there was a wall interaction model that basically just a removed a user specified percentage of incident particles while the rest were reflected back according to the wall model (specular or diffuse). Does it seem possible to just "delete" a percentage or all incident cloud particles? Any thoughts on how this could be implemented? Thanks. |
|
January 25, 2011, 04:27 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
Hi Hyperion,
I'm not an expert of DSMC (I did some work on it some years ago with Bird's code DS2V, but I didn't used it anymore for years), but it seems that your proposal should be ok. In particular, it would be possible to modify the specular reflection model in order to remove a quantity of parcels sufficient to obtain a certain number density rhoN, while velocity and temperature (read, energy) are fixed from the interior. Maybe in this way it could be possible to fix a certain number density, and then a certain pressure. A vacuum boundary means pressure = 0, so you have just to remove all the parcels, I think. Did you success to implement sucha a modified bc? Thanks, Ivan |
|
Tags |
dsmc, vacuum, wall interaction |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Centrifugal Pump and Turbulence Model | Michiel | CFX | 12 | January 25, 2010 04:20 |
Problems bout CFD model of biomass gasification, Downdraft gasifier | wanglong | FLUENT | 2 | November 26, 2009 00:27 |
Reynolds Stress model in CFX vs Fluent | Tim | CFX | 1 | October 7, 2009 07:19 |
help for different between les model (subgrid-scale model) | liuyuxuan | FLUENT | 1 | October 2, 2009 16:25 |
Grid resolution for full-scale and down scaled model | gravis | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 2, 2009 11:27 |