|
[Sponsors] |
August 19, 2010, 08:05 |
bubbleFoam validation case
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Balkrishna Patankar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pune
Posts: 123
Rep Power: 17 |
I faced the following difficulty.
I switch off the dispersed phase volume fraction at inlet . That is inlet alpha = uniform 0 and also the dispersed phase velocity . I keep my continuous phase velocity Ub = 0.1 m/s . Continuous properties are rho = 1000 kg/m3 , nu = 1e-06 m2/s . This means now i am studying single phase flow . I compared the results to simpleFoam results and have found a problem with the velocity plots in the plane z=0.2 on the same timestep . Specifically on the line joining (0 0.5 0.2) and (1 0.5 0.2) . Can someone help me resolve this issue .... My blockMeshDict is as follows : Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------* \ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: 1.7.0 | | \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.com | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; object blockMeshDict; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // convertToMeters 1; vertices ( (0 0 0) (0.25 0 0) (0.25 0.25 0) (0 0.25 0) (0 0.75 0) (0.25 0.75 0) (0 1 0) (0.25 1 0) (0.75 0 0) (0.75 0.25 0) (1 0 0) (1 0.25 0) (0.75 0.75 0) (1 0.75 0) (0.75 1 0) (1 1 0) (0 0 2) (0.25 0 2) (0.25 0.25 2) (0 0.25 2) (0 0.75 2) (0.25 0.75 2) (0 1 2) (0.25 1 2) (0.75 0 2) (0.75 0.25 2) (1 0 2) (1 0.25 2) (0.75 0.75 2) (1 0.75 2) (0.75 1 2) (1 1 2) ); blocks ( hex (0 1 2 3 16 17 18 19) (10 10 10) simpleGrading (1 1 1) hex (3 2 5 4 19 18 21 20) (10 10 10) simpleGrading (1 1 1) hex (4 5 7 6 20 21 23 22) (10 10 10) simpleGrading (1 1 1) hex (1 8 9 2 17 24 25 18) (10 10 10) simpleGrading (1 1 1) hex (2 9 12 5 18 25 28 21) (10 10 10) simpleGrading (1 1 1) hex (5 12 14 7 21 28 30 23) (10 10 10) simpleGrading (1 1 1) hex (8 10 11 9 24 26 27 25) (10 10 10) simpleGrading (1 1 1) hex (9 11 13 12 25 27 29 28) (10 10 10) simpleGrading (1 1 1) hex (12 13 15 14 28 29 31 30) (10 10 10) simpleGrading (1 1 1) ); edges ( ); patches ( patch inlet ( (2 5 12 9) ) patch outlet ( (16 19 18 17) (19 20 21 18) (20 22 23 21) (17 18 25 24) (18 21 28 25) (21 23 30 28) (24 25 27 26) (25 28 29 27) (28 30 31 29) ) wall fixedWalls ( (0 16 19 3) (3 19 20 4) (4 20 22 6) (6 22 23 7) (7 23 30 14) (14 30 31 15) (15 31 29 13) (13 29 27 11) (11 27 26 10) (10 26 24 8) (8 24 17 1) (1 17 16 0) (0 3 2 1) (3 4 5 2) (4 6 7 5) (5 7 14 12) (12 14 15 13) (9 12 13 11) (8 9 11 10) (1 2 9 8) ) ); mergePatchPairs ( ); // ************************************************************************* // |
|
Tags |
bubble, bubblefoam, foam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Comparison of axisymmetric case, Starccm+ and OpenFOAM | linnemann | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 12 | June 16, 2011 06:43 |
Need help to open an OpenFoam case with Paraviw | aaurouss | OpenFOAM | 2 | July 6, 2009 14:18 |
Validation Case | Ruben | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 1, 2005 11:50 |
Validation case for turbulent flow | Ratan | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 4, 2005 04:03 |
Validation case for turbulent flow | Ratan | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 4, 2005 04:02 |