|
[Sponsors] |
June 30, 2010, 11:00 |
Restarting with pimpleFoam
|
#1 |
New Member
Daniel Einstein
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
I have been using pimpleFoam lately and am very satisfied with its performance. Lately, however, when network issues caused my simulation to die I noticed that restarts are problematic. Perhaps someone can shed some light on this for me. Specifically, I was running with a variable time steps and a maxCo of 0.9. The simulation was terminated (due to a network glitch not any fault of pimpleFoam) at t=0.03 with a maxCo of 0.8 and a time step of 0.002. When I restarted it from t=0.03, the maxCo went to 1.8 and the time step (logically) went down to 0.0004. Ok all good. But from there it basically never recovered. The maxCo hovers at 0.9 and the timestep is now order 1E-05. If I start from scratch (t=0), the simulation sails (accurately) through this time slice with a large time step an a reasonable maxCo. In other words, basically the restart di not work. Any clues? |
|
November 26, 2013, 09:22 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Onno
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 120
Rep Power: 15 |
Did you find a solution? I am running a simulation using pimpleDyMFoam, after I kill it and restart the time step drops from 4e-4 to 7e-9.
Can some provide a solution and/or an explanation. I need to restart since I want to run LRR as turbulence model. |
|
November 26, 2013, 13:40 |
|
#3 |
Member
Timo K.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: University of Stuttgart
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi,
can you try a fixed timestep!? And do you see a pressure jump? Best |
|
November 26, 2013, 13:45 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Onno
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 120
Rep Power: 15 |
I tried a fixed time step, which resulted in a maximal courant number of 551 and the abrupt end of the run.
|
|
November 26, 2013, 13:53 |
|
#5 |
Member
Timo K.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: University of Stuttgart
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 16 |
In the first timestep?
|
|
November 26, 2013, 13:58 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Onno
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 120
Rep Power: 15 |
In the first time step after the restart, yes.
Could there be a problem with the DynamicMesh? |
|
November 27, 2013, 05:59 |
|
#7 |
Member
Timo K.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: University of Stuttgart
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 16 |
There might be a problem with combination of PIMPLE and dynamic mesh!?
|
|
November 27, 2013, 08:42 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Onno
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 120
Rep Power: 15 |
Next time I restart, I will set the writeInterval to 1. Maybe pimpleDyMFoam rotates the mesh too far upon restart. Should be visible in Paraview.
|
|
November 27, 2013, 09:23 |
|
#9 |
Member
Timo K.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: University of Stuttgart
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 16 |
which version do you use?
There was a bug in 2.0.? or 2.1.? with AMI... |
|
November 27, 2013, 09:53 |
|
#10 |
Senior Member
Onno
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 120
Rep Power: 15 |
I use 2.2.2. According to github there have been no changes to pimpleDyMFoam in the last couple of months.
|
|
Tags |
pimplefoam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
pimpleFoam Body Force | mdjames | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 24 | November 4, 2021 21:59 |
Running stably with a large Courant number using pimpleFoam | mlawson | OpenFOAM | 11 | November 29, 2014 11:37 |
Problem running IDDES with pimpleFoam | charlie | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | July 11, 2013 12:45 |
tried with pimpleFoam and a big CFL = 5 | ivan_cozza | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | June 4, 2013 19:14 |
PimpleFoam problem | Vadims.geza | OpenFOAM | 8 | December 7, 2011 09:54 |