|
[Sponsors] |
solution diverges when linear upwind interpolation scheme is used |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 29, 2010, 02:23 |
solution diverges when linear upwind interpolation scheme is used
|
#1 |
New Member
subash
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi,
I am trying to simulate supersonic flow over a ramp. The solution works well when I use a limitedlinear 1 interpolation scheme for div, but when it is converted to a second order interpolation scheme(linear upwind) the courant number which floats around 0.45 for quite sometime seems to jump suddenly to values above thousand with the number of inner iterations reaching 1000's. I have tried to run it with constant courant number also but still the solution diverges. the fvScheme file which works fine is as shown below ddtSchemes { default Euler; } gradSchemes { default Gauss linear; } divSchemes { default none; div(phi,U) Gauss limitedLinearV 1; div(phi,k) Gauss upwind; div(phi,epsilon) Gauss upwind; div(phi,R) Gauss upwind; div(R) Gauss linear; div(phid,p) Gauss limitedLinear 1; div(phiU,p) Gauss limitedLinear 1; div(phi,h) Gauss limitedLinear 1; div((muEff*dev2(grad(U).T()))) Gauss linear; } laplacianSchemes { default none; laplacian(muEff,U) Gauss linear corrected; laplacian(DkEff,k) Gauss linear corrected; laplacian(DREff,R) Gauss linear corrected; laplacian(DepsilonEff,epsilon) Gauss linear corrected; laplacian((rho*(1|A(U))),p) Gauss linear corrected; laplacian(alphaEff,h) Gauss linear corrected; } interpolationSchemes { default linear; } snGradSchemes { default corrected; } fluxRequired { default yes; p; } And the modified file which is diverging is as follows ddtSchemes { default Euler; } gradSchemes { default Gauss linear; } divSchemes { default none; div(phi,U) Gauss linearUpwind Gauss; div(phi,k) Gauss linearUpwind Gauss; div(phi,epsilon) Gauss linearUpwind Gauss; div(phi,R) Gauss linearUpwind Gauss; div(R) Gauss linear; div(phid,p) Gauss limitedLinear 1; div(phiU,p) Gauss limitedLinear 1; div(phi,e) Gauss limitedLinear 1; div((muEff*dev2(grad(U).T()))) Gauss linear; } laplacianSchemes { default none; laplacian(muEff,U) Gauss linear corrected; laplacian(DkEff,k) Gauss linear corrected; laplacian(DREff,R) Gauss linear corrected; laplacian(DepsilonEff,epsilon) Gauss linear corrected; laplacian((rho*(1|A(U))),p) Gauss linear corrected; laplacian(alphaEff,e) Gauss linear corrected; } interpolationSchemes { default linear; } snGradSchemes { default corrected; } fluxRequired { default yes; p; } can someone please tell me how do I recognise(in OpenFoam) whether a transient problem being run is explicit or implicit. Also how do I get the problem to converge with second order upwind scheme. Thank you. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
vanLeer Interpolation Scheme with interFoam | rassilon | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | April 8, 2010 03:51 |
what interpolation scheme should I use? | titio | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | October 12, 2009 12:03 |
Water pump OpenFOAM 15 ANSYS CFX 110 comparation | waynezw0618 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 39 | March 5, 2009 13:57 |
Upwind scheme | KM | CFX | 4 | September 27, 2007 15:41 |
Upwind flux scheme | Biga | FLUENT | 0 | January 12, 2006 13:41 |