|
[Sponsors] |
domainIntegrate, dieselFoam and Lagrangian Fields |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 14, 2010, 16:16 |
domainIntegrate, dieselFoam and Lagrangian Fields
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Marco A. Turcios
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 740
Rep Power: 28 |
I'm working on upgrading an in-house solver from OpenFoam 1.4.1 to 1.5 (and eventually 1.6, one step at a time). Since 1.5 introduced lagrangian fields being written, I was wondering if domainIntegrate and similar functions add both the Lagrangian and Eulerian fields together for this.
The reason is I am tracking C7H16 in a solver based on dieselFoam, and the new version shows a much faster increase than the 1.4.1 version, though the final amount is the same as expected. I checked all my dictionaries and the properties are identical, so the only possibilities are that: 1) Langrangian fields are now included in when performing a domain integration 2) There has been some changes "under-the-hood" for the spray that causes it to behave differently. (Doesn't look like it, as I've been comparing source files for a few afternoons here) If 1) is true, then how should I extract the amount of C7H16 in the domain not including liquid phase? Thanks |
|
Tags |
chemistry, combustion, dieselenginefoam, dieselfoam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sampling lagrangian data | farbfilm | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 37 | June 26, 2020 11:09 |
dieselFoam: how to implement thermo for liquid/gas continuous phase | natrask | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | July 16, 2009 06:37 |
Lagrangian and Continous field donbt match after formToVTK | sebastian_vogl | OpenFOAM Bugs | 0 | August 28, 2008 11:35 |
Postprocess lagrangian fields | dhebert | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 2 | December 21, 2006 18:46 |