|
[Sponsors] |
April 22, 2010, 08:06 |
Forces in compressible internal flow
|
#1 |
New Member
sasha
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi all,
I tried calculate forces that act on cylinder inside a pipe. when i used simplefoam ,i get very good result. but when i switch to rhoporoussimplefoam (with zero porosity - i use it as a template for steady state compressible flow - air) i get wrong direction and component of force greater x150 . for finding force i used : functions ( forces { type forces; functionObjectLibs ("libforces.so"); //Lib to load patches (buhna); // change to your patch name rhoInf 1.24; //Reference density for fluid CofR (0 0 0); //Origin for moment calculations } ); Is there anyone who can explain how do it right. thanks in advance Sasha |
|
April 24, 2010, 18:58 |
|
#2 |
New Member
sasha
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 16 |
hi all,
anyone have expirience with force Utility for use it for Compressible Flow Fields ? i tried look at forum but nothing. please help, becouse i have very strange result ,and i don't understand where is problem thank you p.s. i tried also with rhoSimpleFoam, and with rhoTurbFoam and i get similar result as in rhoporoussimplefoam.I work in O.F. 1.5 and geometry from SALOME. If there some indication that problem in mesh? i read that yplus in turbulent flow must be 30<y+<100, in my case average of y+ on cylinder is 1 (flow is turbulent, RE>20000). wait for your suggestion . thank in advance Sasha Last edited by zabar; April 25, 2010 at 15:52. |
|
April 26, 2010, 04:54 |
|
#3 |
New Member
sasha
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 16 |
i tried refine the mesh - the same result.
what i should to do |
|
April 26, 2010, 11:13 |
|
#4 |
Member
|
I' sorry,
But I never need to calculate forces. What is the turbulence model that you are using? Do you use wall functions? Because if you do the y+ around 30 and 100 should work fine, but if you don't use wall functions you need a low-Re turbulence model that can solve the boundary layer. Hope it helps, CX |
|
April 26, 2010, 11:44 |
|
#5 |
New Member
sasha
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi Carlos,
thank you for your answer, i use k-e model, and not used wall function 1.where i can specify them? and what the rule? 2.which low-Re model you can suggest, and what's Re limitation for this model. 3.i read that y+ must be between 30 and 100 for fully turbulent flow- is right? 4.if your suggestion valid both for compressible and incompressible flow ? thank you very much Sasha. |
|
April 26, 2010, 11:59 |
|
#6 |
Member
|
I never used a turbulence model in Foam, my experience is with FLUENT.
>>1.where i can specify them? and what the rule? All high-Re RANS turbulence models include wall-functions because it is inappropriate to use them without. The rule is that for use wall functions you need a valid y+ between 30 and 100 (300 in Fluent). >>2.which low-Re model you can suggest, and what's Re limitation for this model. If you want to use a low-Re you need a y+<=1. I could suggest Spalart-Allmaras, k-w or k-w SST. >>3.i read that y+ must be between 30 and 100 for fully turbulent flow- is right? Yes I think you are right, but If you want such y+ you need to coarse your mesh, in FLUENT is mandatory to use wall functions I think that in foam is also a need. |
|
April 26, 2010, 12:21 |
|
#7 |
New Member
sasha
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 16 |
hi,
>>All high-Re RANS turbulence models include wall-functions because it is inappropriate to use them without. i found them in RASproperties file i will try another RAS model,maybe it will help thank you for your help. sasha |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Incompressible and compressible flow. | Confused student. | Main CFD Forum | 27 | March 18, 2017 13:25 |
Boundary Conditions for Internal compressible Flow | xisto | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 26 | May 17, 2016 03:30 |
About compressible flow at low mach | hit | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 26, 2009 22:21 |
urgent help needed with 2d compressible flow | James | FLUENT | 2 | June 20, 2007 05:22 |
compressible channel flow.. | R.D.Prabhu | Main CFD Forum | 0 | July 17, 1998 18:23 |