|
[Sponsors] |
interDyMFoam mass conservation issues - dam break tutorial |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 6, 2010, 10:47 |
interDyMFoam mass conservation issues - dam break tutorial
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Kyle Mooney
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 323
Rep Power: 18 |
Hi all,
I'm working on validating interDyMFoam and noticed a serious mass conservation issue with the supplied tutorial damBreakWithObstacle - 3D. It appears the the mass begins to decrease strongly as soon as cells are coarsened. Has anyone seen this or know of a bug? See attached graph...(x-axis is volume of liquid in domain - y-axis is time in seconds) Thanks. |
|
April 6, 2010, 10:56 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Kyle Mooney
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 323
Rep Power: 18 |
Upon further inspection it appears that one of the side walls is specified as atmosphere and allows flow out of the domain. In other dam break tutorial set ups the atmosphere patch was at the top. I'm not sure if this is a bug or not.
Thanks. |
|
May 14, 2010, 06:02 |
I have suffered the same problem
|
#3 |
Member
angel
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello,
I'm trying to simulate fluid sloshing inside a tank with InterDyMFoam, subjected to a sinusoidal lateral displacement. I start at 0,05 sec and stop at 58 sec. After that the fluid oscillates freely. When i use the patchIntegrate p walls to obtain the vertical, I obtain a curve that start from -323 N a 0 sec but at the end of my simulation I don't obtain the same value. It seems like if I lose some fluid during the simulation, probably by the solution convergence. I have tried to increase the nAlpahSubCycles, cAlpha and decrease maxCo to 0.25 but the problem still appears. result_Fx_Fy.jpg Can anybody tell me what is the reason to this effect, |
|
May 21, 2010, 02:21 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Claus Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wiesbaden, Germany
Posts: 241
Rep Power: 18 |
Hallo anmartin,
I have just started to occupy myself with mass balance. Could you pleas explain in more detail what is the purpose of the integration of p over the wall? How can I use this information? Cheers in advance |
|
May 28, 2010, 12:07 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
stephane sanchi
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 314
Rep Power: 18 |
Dear all,
I am running the damBreakWithObstacle tutorial in parallel using the Allrun script. #!/bin/sh # Source tutorial run functions . $WM_PROJECT_DIR/bin/tools/RunFunctions runApplication blockMesh runApplication setSet -batch createObstacle.setSet runApplication subsetMesh c0 -patch walls runApplication setFields -latestTime runApplication decomposePar runApplication /opt/mpich/bin/mpirun -machinefile machines -n 4 interDyMFoam The case seems to run fine. I just notice 1 strange thing. The folders 0.021 0.041 0.061 ... are present without doing the command reconstructPar. Is it normal ? Best regards, Stephane |
|
June 1, 2010, 15:23 |
interDyMFoam mass conservation issues
|
#6 |
Member
angel
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello Claus,
I have to integrate p over wall because I want to compare OF results with experimental data in order to validate the total sloshing forces and roll moment. In my test I measure the vertical, lateral and roll moment of a fuel tank filled with water which is excited with a sinusoidal lateral excitation. Best regards, Nueva imagen.jpg |
|
Tags |
dynamic meshing, interdymfoam, mass conservation |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 06:21 |
Free surface boudary conditions with SOLA-VOF | Fan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | September 9, 2006 13:24 |
Mass Conservation in LES | Jaswant | Main CFD Forum | 8 | July 4, 2005 23:32 |
Mass conservation | Diego Nogueira | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 30, 2004 16:50 |
BFC for Dam break problem | Mehdi BEN ELHADJ | Phoenics | 0 | January 18, 2001 16:22 |