|
[Sponsors] |
March 2, 2010, 17:10 |
kOmegaSST in openfoam 1.6
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 111
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello,
I'd like to know if the kOmegaSST in openfoam 1.6 is a low-re Models or not? because in fluent, if I understand well, it is. Also, if that's the case, how to set it up? Cause in the tutorials incompressible/simpleFoam/motorbike in the "constant" directory of this case I have : RASproperties Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: 1.6 | | \\ / A nd | Web: http://www.OpenFOAM.org | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; object RASProperties; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // RASModel kOmegaSST; turbulence on; printCoeffs on; // ************************************************************************* // turbulenceproperties Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: 1.6 | | \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.org | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; location "constant"; object turbulenceProperties; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // turbulenceModel SpalartAllmaras; turbulence on; laminarCoeffs { } kEpsilonCoeffs { Cmu Cmu [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.09; C1 C1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.44; C2 C2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.92; alphaEps alphaEps [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.76923; } RNGkEpsilonCoeffs { Cmu Cmu [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.0845; C1 C1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.42; C2 C2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.68; alphak alphaK [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.39; alphaEps alphaEps [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.39; eta0 eta0 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 4.38; beta beta [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.012; } NonlinearKEShihCoeffs { Cmu Cmu [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.09; C1 C1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.44; C2 C2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.92; alphak alphak [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1; alphaEps alphaEps [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.76932; A1 A1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.25; A2 A2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1000; Ctau1 Ctau1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] -4; Ctau2 Ctau2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 13; Ctau3 Ctau3 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] -2; alphaKsi alphaKsi [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.9; } LienCubicKECoeffs { C1 C1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.44; C2 C2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.92; alphak alphak [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1; alphaEps alphaEps [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.76923; A1 A1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.25; A2 A2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1000; Ctau1 Ctau1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] -4; Ctau2 Ctau2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 13; Ctau3 Ctau3 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] -2; alphaKsi alphaKsi [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.9; } QZetaCoeffs { Cmu Cmu [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.09; C1 C1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.44; C2 C2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.92; alphaZeta alphaZeta [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.76923; anisotropic no; } LaunderSharmaKECoeffs { Cmu Cmu [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.09; C1 C1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.44; C2 C2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.92; alphaEps alphaEps [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.76923; } LamBremhorstKECoeffs { Cmu Cmu [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.09; C1 C1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.44; C2 C2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.92; alphaEps alphaEps [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.76923; } LienCubicKELowReCoeffs { Cmu Cmu [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.09; C1 C1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.44; C2 C2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.92; alphak alphak [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1; alphaEps alphaEps [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.76923; A1 A1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.25; A2 A2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1000; Ctau1 Ctau1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] -4; Ctau2 Ctau2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 13; Ctau3 Ctau3 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] -2; alphaKsi alphaKsi [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.9; Am Am [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.016; Aepsilon Aepsilon [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.263; Amu Amu [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.00222; } LienLeschzinerLowReCoeffs { Cmu Cmu [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.09; C1 C1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.44; C2 C2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.92; alphak alphak [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1; alphaEps alphaEps [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.76923; Am Am [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.016; Aepsilon Aepsilon [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.263; Amu Amu [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.00222; } LRRCoeffs { Cmu Cmu [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.09; Clrr1 Clrr1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.8; Clrr2 Clrr2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.6; C1 C1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.44; C2 C2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.92; Cs Cs [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.25; Ceps Ceps [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.15; alphaEps alphaEps [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.76923; } LaunderGibsonRSTMCoeffs { Cmu Cmu [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.09; Clg1 Clg1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.8; Clg2 Clg2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.6; C1 C1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.44; C2 C2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.92; C1Ref C1Ref [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.5; C2Ref C2Ref [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.3; Cs Cs [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.25; Ceps Ceps [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.15; alphaEps alphaEps [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.76923; alphaR alphaR [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.22; } SpalartAllmarasCoeffs { alphaNut alphaNut [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1.5; Cb1 Cb1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.1355; Cb2 Cb2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.622; Cw2 Cw2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.3; Cw3 Cw3 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 2; Cv1 Cv1 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 7.1; Cv2 Cv2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 5; } wallFunctionCoeffs { kappa kappa [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.4187; E E [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 9; } // ************************************************************************* // Shouldn't it be the same? Does the 2 files are needed? Thanks for your help |
|
March 3, 2010, 05:25 |
|
#2 |
Member
Stefan
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kiel, Germany
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello Gearb0x,
the kOmegaSST turbulence model works with wall functions solely. So it is a high-Re-model! In my state of knowledge there exist a low-Re-model. You will find some discussions within this forum. According to the tutorial "incompressible/simpleFoam/motorbike" i guess that RASproperties is dominant and the solver initialize the associated coeffs from the turbuenceProperties dict. /Stefan |
|
March 3, 2010, 07:02 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 111
Rep Power: 17 |
Thanks for your help
So the model is not useful in my case |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
install OpenFoam 1.6 by building source: how? | niudie | OpenFOAM Installation | 13 | April 26, 2011 01:48 |
Cross-compiling OpenFOAM 1.6 on Linux for Windows 32 and 64bits with Mingw-w64 | wyldckat | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 7 | January 19, 2010 16:39 |
List of glitches found on OpenFOAM 1.6 | wyldckat | OpenFOAM Bugs | 5 | November 17, 2009 08:51 |
OpenFOAM 1.6 package - CentOS 5.3 x86_64 | linnemann | OpenFOAM Installation | 36 | September 2, 2009 13:46 |
OpenFOAM Version 1.6 Released | opencfd | OpenFOAM Announcements from ESI-OpenCFD | 0 | July 27, 2009 18:55 |