|
[Sponsors] |
January 30, 2010, 08:55 |
velocity increases extremely
|
#1 |
Member
Axel Söhngen
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany, Trier
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello,
I'm trying to create an external flow over a cylinder. I made 2D mesh with blockMesh. First I try the case with a velocity of 1 m/s and Re=150. I'm using icoFoam but when I start the calculation the velocity increses with every timestep but it has to be constant. Whats the mistake?? Here are p and U dictionaries: p: dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 0; boundaryField { frontAndBack { type empty; } inlet { type zeroGradient; } outlet { type fixedValue; value uniform 0; } lowerWall { type symmetryPlane; } upperWall { type symmetryPlane; } zylinder { type zeroGradient; } } U: dimensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform (0 0 0); boundaryField { inlet { type fixedValue; value uniform (1 0 0); } outlet { type zeroGradient; } frontAndBack { type empty; } lowerWall { type symmetryPlane; } upperWall { type symmetryPlane; } zylinder { type fixedValue; value uniform (0 0 0); } Thanks in advance |
|
January 30, 2010, 11:32 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
Are you doing a transient or steady-state simulation?
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
|
January 31, 2010, 07:36 |
|
#3 |
Member
Axel Söhngen
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany, Trier
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello sega,
I'm doing a transient simulation! |
|
January 31, 2010, 07:54 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Claus Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wiesbaden, Germany
Posts: 241
Rep Power: 18 |
How does it themselves felt? I mean, do ya have, for instance, a CFL-drop or do you see it by doing pros-processing?
Cheers |
|
January 31, 2010, 08:20 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
I'm not sure, but have you tried a different boundary condition for pressure on the outlet? Prescribing a pressure may be not always the right choice.
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
|
January 31, 2010, 08:27 |
|
#6 |
Member
Axel Söhngen
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany, Trier
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello Claus,
the cfl increases extremely, and in paraview is shown that the velocity increases every timestep too. I try to simulate the karman vortex street with a Re of 100. |
|
January 31, 2010, 08:53 |
|
#7 |
Member
Axel Söhngen
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany, Trier
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 16 |
No I haven't tried another boundary for pressure at outlet! What else can I choose for the pressure at outlet? And is the pressure at the cylinder (uniform 0) the right choice?
Thank you for your reply |
|
January 31, 2010, 09:12 |
|
#8 | |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
Quote:
I would choose zeroGradient!
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
||
January 31, 2010, 09:25 |
|
#9 |
Member
Axel Söhngen
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany, Trier
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 16 |
Ok that's right. But the courant number and velocity still explode.
|
|
January 31, 2010, 17:21 |
|
#10 |
Senior Member
Claus Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wiesbaden, Germany
Posts: 241
Rep Power: 18 |
Choosing a zeroGradient is the worse thing you can do, because of the pressure term in the Navier-Stokes-Equation, i.e. you have to specified the pressure at least in one point.
Have you checked your mesh? A blow up is also related to singularities which can occur by bifurcation, so try a finer mesh or check if it fit the physical behavior of your scenario. Cheers |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ATTENTION! Reliability problems in CFX 5.7 | Joseph | CFX | 14 | April 20, 2010 16:45 |
Velocity in Porous medium : HELP! HELP! HELP! | Kali Sanjay | Phoenics | 0 | November 6, 2006 07:10 |
Variables Definition in CFX Solver 5.6 | R P | CFX | 2 | October 26, 2004 03:13 |
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History | Abhi | Main CFD Forum | 12 | July 8, 2002 10:11 |
what the result is negatif pressure at inlet | chong chee nan | FLUENT | 0 | December 29, 2001 06:13 |