|
[Sponsors] |
June 13, 2014, 00:07 |
|
#21 | |
New Member
fairuz
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: University of Queensland, Australia
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
So doing this is sufficient enough?Do u have done any other modification in order to correct the boundary condition? |
||
June 13, 2014, 01:44 |
|
#22 |
Member
Ivor Clifford
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 17 |
I typically use custom boundaries for a problem like this since often we're looking to fix a temperature, velocity, heat flux or apply some other heat source/sink at the boundary, and we need to supply expressions for total enthalpy in terms of these variables . This is no different from what OpenFOAM already does for the enthalpy equation... I just customized it for my specific case.
I have attached the boundary I use that takes the temperature and velocity boundaries conditions and defines the total enthalpy in terms of these. Regards Ivor |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end | xiuying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | August 27, 2013 16:33 |
Error log | vw.cfd | OpenFOAM | 6 | August 7, 2009 06:44 |
Differences between serial and parallel runs | carsten | OpenFOAM Bugs | 11 | September 12, 2008 12:16 |
Unknown error | sivakumar | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 9 | September 9, 2008 13:53 |
Why FVM for high-Re flows? | Zhong Lei | Main CFD Forum | 23 | May 14, 1999 14:22 |