|
[Sponsors] |
December 4, 2009, 09:44 |
blockMesh problem
|
#1 |
Member
Dennis Rown
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello!
I have a problem with blockMesh. I modelled a tube with a hole on an upper side where water (alpha1 = 1) flows in. The problem is, when I change the z-values of the mesh to a high number, the water disappears from the simulation. As in the example picture I attached it works for the z value "3" on the outer blocks. When I choose a higher z-value, water disappears. What can cause this? |
|
December 8, 2009, 16:03 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
What is your boundary condition for the inflow?
Did you set up a small value of water (liquid phase volume fraction) which you have fogotten with your simulations z>3?
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
|
December 9, 2009, 06:00 |
|
#3 |
Member
Dennis Rown
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 17 |
My boundary conditions for alpha1, p and U are:
alpha1: walls { type zeroGradient; } ends { type inletOutlet; inletValue uniform 0; value uniform 0; } inletHole { type inletOutlet; inletValue uniform 1; value uniform 1; } p: walls { type buoyantPressure; value uniform 0; } ends { type totalPressure; p0 uniform 0; U U; phi phi; rho rho; psi none; gamma 1; value uniform 0; } inletHole { type totalPressure; p0 uniform 0; U U; phi phi; rho rho; psi none; gamma 1; value uniform 0; } U: walls { type fixedValue; value uniform (0 0 0); } ends { type pressureInletOutletVelocity; value uniform (0 0 0); } inletHole { type pressureInletOutletVelocity; value uniform (0 0 0); } I am not sure if this conditions are correct, because i tried to take them from a 2D sample case into this 3D case. What I found out is that when I switch boundary conditions of "walls" and "ends" it works (the water does not disappear, but falls through the walls) Sorry, I do not understand, what you mean with that I forgot the value of water with the simulations of z>3. |
|
December 9, 2009, 06:39 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Sebastian Gatzka
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 20 |
I'm not sure either, but I will give you my thoughts about them.
You are using a prediscribed boundary value for alpha and velocity at the inlet. But your velocity is set to zero (uniform (0 0 0)). So how should water "grow" inside your domain? If you specify an amount of water in the proximity of the inlet there maybe some results because the CSF-model can compute forces on the drop. But with no inflow-velocity your amount of water will not grow.
__________________
Schrödingers wife: "What did you do to the cat? It's half dead!" |
|
December 9, 2009, 07:21 |
|
#5 |
Member
Dennis Rown
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 17 |
But it does grow, since I use a gravity! It only disappears completely when the pipe steepness (mesh) exceeds certain gradient.
|
|
December 9, 2009, 09:18 |
|
#6 |
Member
Dennis Rown
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 17 |
Looks like with your information (usinng a downward velocity at the inlet) it seems to work even with the steep mesh. Water does not disappear instantly!
Thanks a lot! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UDF compiling problem | Wouter | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 6 | June 6, 2012 05:43 |
Incoherent problem table in hollow-fiber spinning | Gianni | FLUENT | 0 | April 5, 2008 11:33 |
natural convection problem for a CHT problem | Se-Hee | CFX | 2 | June 10, 2007 07:29 |
Adiabatic and Rotating wall (Convection problem) | ParodDav | CFX | 5 | April 29, 2007 20:13 |
Is this problem well posed? | Thomas P. Abraham | Main CFD Forum | 5 | September 8, 1999 15:52 |