|
[Sponsors] |
September 30, 2009, 05:42 |
OpenFoam queries
|
#1 |
New Member
varun
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
I have a few queries with a few openfoam settings:
Mesh non-orthogonality Max:61.5 average:12.4196 Does this mean i have to use northogonalcorrectors as 12?
Thnx 2 everyone in advance!!! varun p.s: I have a tetrahedral mesh with 10 laminar sub-layers near the wall. Last edited by vw.cfd; September 30, 2009 at 06:00. |
|
September 30, 2009, 20:09 |
|
#2 | |
Assistant Moderator
Bernhard Gschaider
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,225
Rep Power: 51 |
Quote:
I had a look at your profile. 14 posts and all of them of a similar "witty"/unhelpful variety. I think they would be much funnier if you posted them under your real name. Getting an additional anonymous account (and I guess this is your second account) is a bit childish. If you don't think that these questions are not up to your standards ignore them. It works for most of us Bernhard |
||
October 1, 2009, 04:12 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 17 |
annoyed is just a dump kiddy or frustrated old man, ignore him.
|
|
October 1, 2009, 07:46 |
|
#4 |
New Member
|
for a clear overview on the meaning and effects of orthogonal correctors refer to Hrvoje's PhD thesis, section 3.7
(available somewhere online ) |
|
October 1, 2009, 08:26 |
|
#5 |
New Member
varun
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
Thank you all for defending me and bearing with my naive questions. I read a lot of threads from the forum and have understood more about orthogonalcorrectors and time averaging of the solution files. But, i have still not been able to define the Internalfield's for the turbulence parameters. Any help or suggestion of realted threads/topics would be very helpful. ThanX!!! varun |
|
October 1, 2009, 11:07 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Valentin Fischer
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi vw.cfd,
you can define the internal field by using the following syntax. You have to do that for all of your variables you define in the "0" directory. One hint: Check the value for k which you define in your inlet boundary condition. The value of k has a not negligible influence on the flow downstream even on the flow which is far away from the inlet. This effect I try to understand right now. Any hints or explanations for this are welcome. Kind regards Valle FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class volScalarField; location "0"; object k; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 0.01; boundaryField { SURF_3 { type zeroGradient; } SURF_2 { type zeroGradient; } SURF_1 { type zeroGradient; } OUTLET { type zeroGradient; } INLET { type fixedValue; value uniform 50; } SURF_3_BACK { type zeroGradient; } } // ************************************************** *********************** // |
|
Tags |
mesh quality, time average, turbulence model |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 06:36 |
Modified OpenFOAM Forum Structure and New Mailing-List | pete | Site News & Announcements | 0 | June 29, 2009 06:56 |
64bitrhel5 OF installation instructions | mirko | OpenFOAM Installation | 2 | August 12, 2008 19:07 |
Adventure of fisrst openfoam installation on Ubuntu 710 | jussi | OpenFOAM Installation | 0 | April 24, 2008 15:25 |
OpenFOAM Debian packaging current status problems and TODOs | oseen | OpenFOAM Installation | 9 | August 26, 2007 14:50 |