|
[Sponsors] |
September 8, 2009, 12:11 |
Turbulent timescale
|
#1 |
New Member
Max
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 17 |
Dear all,
I am currently facing the problem of determining the local turbulent timescale, and I want to implement a function which does not depend from the kind of turbulence model used (LES/RAS). Looking inside solvers which already implement it (i.e. reacting*Foam) I have discovered something like this volScalarField tk = Cmix*sqrt(turbulence->muEff()/rho/turbulence->epsilon()); which should indeed represent a quite general approach. However, I have the following questions: - why does the expression contain muEff() and not mut()? According to my knowledge muEff includes the molecular viscosity. Even if this latter may be negligible in cold, high-Reynolds flows, I am pretty sure that in combustion applications the two viscosity may locallybe comparable! - is there any other possible approach I may use to get this quantity from both LES and RAS model? Thanks in advance, Max |
|
Tags |
combustion, timescales, turbulence |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turbulent Boundary Layer on a Flat Plate | Hoshang Garda | FLUENT | 1 | November 27, 2013 11:24 |
setting value of turbulent intensity and turbulent viscosity ratio in wind tunnel | nuimlabib | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 4, 2009 01:05 |
Solid Timescale Control | Parthipan | CFX | 2 | August 24, 2007 11:07 |
SST in 2D? | Jesper Sรธrensen | CFX | 16 | December 23, 2006 09:40 |
Problem of Turbulent Viscosity Ratio Limited | David Yang | FLUENT | 3 | June 3, 2002 07:13 |