|
[Sponsors] |
July 22, 2009, 09:13 |
binary heavier than ascii
|
#1 |
Member
Julien Schaguene
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: France
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi all,
maybe it's a trivial question but as long as I was doing some test to improve my use of openfoam, it appears that compressed binary results are heavier than ascii ones. My example is: 9000 elements, 100 steps written, constant+system: 2Mo Results: ascii uncompressed: 89Mo compressed (gzip): 35Mo binary uncompressed: 79Mo compressed (gzip): 66Mo I was sure before that binary compressed would be lighter. I think it is not really related to OF, but if someone made the same observation or have an explanation, it would take me out of scepticism. Regards Julien |
|
July 22, 2009, 09:30 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Henrik Rusche
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Wernigerode, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany
Posts: 281
Rep Power: 18 |
Dear Julien
your analysis is correct AND it should be like this. The binary is more accurate and the ascii compresses better because the file contains mostly of the 10 numbers + "." + "e". Henrik |
|
July 22, 2009, 09:38 |
|
#3 |
Member
Julien Schaguene
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: France
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 17 |
Dear Henrik
Thank you very much for answering so quickly and precisely, Regards, Julien |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fluent Remote Simulation Facility Service (RSF) di | Rami | FLUENT | 2 | June 4, 2008 06:38 |
"Memory too low" problem with Fluent HELP NEEDED | Amr | FLUENT | 6 | May 8, 2006 13:06 |
Error to re-open fluent case file | J.Gimbun | FLUENT | 0 | April 27, 2006 09:42 |
Sliding mesh error | Karl Kevala | FLUENT | 4 | February 21, 2001 16:52 |
Binary files stored by Fluent | Jackson | FLUENT | 1 | April 2, 2000 22:58 |