|
[Sponsors] |
July 16, 2009, 08:06 |
MULES in interPhaseChangeFoam
|
#1 |
Senior Member
isabel
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 171
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello everybody
In gammaEqn.H of interPhaseChangeFoam solver we have these lines: volScalarField Sp ( IOobject ( "Sp", runTime.timeName(), mesh ), vDotvAlphal - vDotcAlphal ); volScalarField Su ( IOobject ( "Su", runTime.timeName(), mesh ), divU*gamma + vDotcAlphal ); MULES::implicitSolve(oneField(), gamma, phi, phiGamma, Sp, Su, 1, 0); why isn't Sp zero, if the equation to solve (MULESTemplates.C) is this: d(1*psi)/dt + div(phigamma) + Sp*gamma - Su = 0 Is Sp different from zero to improve convergence? Or what? Last edited by isabel; July 17, 2009 at 03:36. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
InterFoam MULES solver | jaswi | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | June 21, 2022 09:46 |
gammaEqn.H in the interPhaseChangeFoam solver | isabel | OpenFOAM | 2 | July 7, 2009 14:41 |
Errno 24 linux | ivanwhlau | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | July 1, 2009 11:16 |
Restarting interDyMFoam | hsieh | OpenFOAM Bugs | 4 | January 25, 2009 16:19 |
Differences between serial and parallel runs | carsten | OpenFOAM Bugs | 11 | September 12, 2008 12:16 |