|
[Sponsors] |
pipe with buoyantFoam buoyancy, boundary conditions |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 15, 2009, 09:58 |
pipe with buoyantFoam buoyancy, boundary conditions
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Posts: 104
Rep Power: 17 |
Dear all,
I try to simulate a pipe flow axis-symmetric. The mesh was generated in Gambit (one cell thick) and converted with fluentMeshToFoam and scaled. After it was made axis-symmetric with the application makeAxialMesh. When running with icoFoam there are no solving problems, but I want to use a heated wall with buoyancy effects, the acceleration is parallel to the pipe. And there I get no solution... The boundary layers are: * inlet Eingang * outlet Ausgang * wedge (frontAndBack) * wall (oben) * axis The Fluid is air and I try to solve without implementation of turbulence modelling. But what kind of boundary conditions are neccessary so solve. I read a lot in the forum and tested... p dimensions [1 -1 -2 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 100000; boundaryField { oben { type calculated; value uniform 100000; } axis { type empty; } frontAndBack { type empty; } eingang { type zeroGradient; } ausgang { type calculated; value uniform 100000; } symmetry_pos { type wedge; } symmetry_neg { type wedge; } symmetry { type empty; } } // ************************************************** *********************** pd dimensions [1 -1 -2 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 0; boundaryField { oben { type fixedFluxBuoyantPressure; value uniform 0; } axis { type empty; } frontAndBack { type empty; } eingang { type zeroGradient; } ausgang { type fixedFluxBuoyantPressure; value uniform 0; } symmetry_pos { type wedge; } symmetry_neg { type wedge; } symmetry { type empty; } } // ************************************************** *********************** U dimensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform (3 0 0); boundaryField { oben { type fixedValue; value uniform (0 0 0); } symmetry { type empty; } axis { type empty; } frontAndBack { type empty; } ausgang { type zeroGradient; } eingang { type fixedValue; value uniform (3 0 0); } symmetry_pos { type wedge; } symmetry_neg { type wedge; } } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // T dimensions [0 0 0 1 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 300; boundaryField { oben { type fixedValue; value uniform 300; } symmetry { type empty; } axis { type empty; } frontAndBack { type empty; } ausgang { type zeroGradient; } eingang { type fixedValue; value uniform 300; } symmetry_pos { type wedge; } symmetry_neg { type wedge; } } // ************************************************** *********************** // Could someone please give me a hint. Thanks a lot, Thomas Baumann |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Defining "Neutral" boundary conditions? (force=0) | MW | FLUENT | 5 | October 5, 2009 05:55 |
Please help with flow around car modelling! | Tudor Miron | CFX | 17 | March 19, 2004 20:23 |
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History | Abhi | Main CFD Forum | 12 | July 8, 2002 10:11 |
Pipe Flow Boundary conditions | Kunal Jain | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 4, 2001 21:52 |
fluid flow fundas | ram | Main CFD Forum | 5 | June 17, 2000 22:31 |