|
[Sponsors] |
February 11, 2005, 10:05 |
There is a discussion going on
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There is a discussion going on regarding the move of the FOAM Forum from its current address to the CFD-Online web site. I hope you all know about CFD-Online (http://www.cfd-online.com) and I was wondering if people visiting this forum have a preference. In my opinion, the move will expose the forum to a larger community and this can only be beneficial, both in terms of the quality of answers and the number of FOAM users.
Any comments are appreciated, Hrv |
|
February 11, 2005, 12:04 |
I think this is a great idea.
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think this is a great idea.
|
|
February 12, 2005, 04:24 |
Hi,
I think it is a good i
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I think it is a good idea in terms of exposing the forum to a larger community, but unfortunately I will not be able to follow this forum with my mail program anymore. Maybe, you can province Jonas Larsson from CFD-Online to use some program which is able to provide some mail-handling (like a maillist). I mean it would be much easier and faster for everybody to make the discussions with a mail user agent than over some kind of web-interface. Right now, I am not using OpenFoam active, but I try to convince my department to use it. Keeping track on the discussions is pretty easy with my mail user agent; though I miss the ability to response with my mail program. So I will miss to follow the discussions with my MUA when this forum moves to CFD-Online. Greetings! Fabian |
|
February 12, 2005, 08:42 |
If the OpenFOAM discussion mo
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If the OpenFOAM discussion moves to CFD-online, it will probably not be using the current forum software employed by CFD-online. Although I can't guarantee anything, it is highly likely that whatever the new format is, it will support mailing list style distribution of forum posts.
Eugene |
|
February 12, 2005, 09:44 |
I would believe that the www.
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I would believe that the www.cfd-online.com forum slot would place FOAM in the main CFD spotlight - so to speak. It seems to be a very well-run site with a very wide readership.
Since I was the one who raised the last request on cfd-online & having only recently signed up to this forum, I do apologise if I have created any conflicts. I just felt that it would be appropriate for OpenFOAM to get the coverage it deserves. I believe that it would result in a potentially much larger readership. FOAM is an absolutely excellent tool that deserves to do well. Regards, diaw... |
|
August 9, 2005, 08:20 |
Dear All,
the discussion si
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Mattijs Janssens
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,419
Rep Power: 26 |
Dear All,
the discussion site is becoming quite unresponsive due to the number of invalid email addresses. Please make sure the email address you specify is valid or switch off email notification in your profile. I will delete all users that have invalid email addresses. Kind regards, Mattijs |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moving Reference frame - UDF - Moving mesh | modisa | FLUENT | 0 | April 18, 2008 14:31 |
CFX forum Vs Fluent University forum | Amvy | CFX | 4 | February 12, 2008 17:44 |
Non CFD Forum | Gerrit | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 11, 2006 09:48 |
forum about the "MD" | ztdep | Main CFD Forum | 4 | May 8, 2006 10:23 |
discussion about MRF/moving mesh from Fluent forum | Elvis | Main CFD Forum | 3 | April 22, 2006 12:08 |