|
[Sponsors] |
July 26, 2022, 18:55 |
Lagrangian solver
|
#1 |
New Member
Emad S
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 4 |
Hi all.
Since we define parcels as a number of particles, why do we have to define clouds? Thanks Emad |
|
July 26, 2022, 21:19 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Emad S
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 4 |
Also
- In discrete phase method (DPM) the forces are solved for parcels or particles or cloud in dpmfoam? - if nParticle=1 are dpm and dem exactly the same? |
|
July 27, 2022, 11:39 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Emad S
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 4 |
And anothe question:
I have defined stick parameter between the particles and the wall. When a particle sticks to a wall the whole cloud stickes or the parcel including that particle or just the individual particle? |
|
July 29, 2022, 12:00 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
Josh Williams
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Scotland
Posts: 113
Rep Power: 5 |
Quote:
Yes, if number of particles in parcel is one, then DPM = DEM. Otherwise, it is same as 'coarse DEM'. |
||
July 31, 2022, 10:48 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
Emad S
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 4 |
Quote:
How the diameter of the cloud is defined? And do parcels leave a cloud? |
||
August 11, 2022, 05:35 |
|
#6 | |
Senior Member
Josh Williams
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Scotland
Posts: 113
Rep Power: 5 |
Quote:
Parcels do not leave a cloud. Particles do not leave a parcel (I think). |
||
August 16, 2022, 13:37 |
|
#7 | |
New Member
Emad S
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 4 |
Quote:
If a cloud does not have a diameter then the forces like drag force which is a function of diameter is calculated for each parcel if it has a diameter, otherwise calculation is conducted over each particle! What is the rationale behind defining clouds and parcels then?! We are just doing dem imo! |
||
August 16, 2022, 14:18 |
|
#8 | |
Senior Member
Josh Williams
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Scotland
Posts: 113
Rep Power: 5 |
Quote:
In OpenFOAM, you define the diameter of one particle. You define how many particles are in one parcel. You can calculate the forces using the particle diameter. Lets say you use parcel approach like MPPIC, you calculate drag based on particle diameter (p.d() in the source code). Then you apply some collision kernel (like Harris-Crighton in tutorials), which is based on the number of parcels in each cell, the number of particles in a parcel, and the individual particle diameter. If you have further difficulty, I suggest you review the source code Code:
cd $FOAM_SRC/lagrangian/intermediate/parcels/Templates/KinematicCloud Code:
cd $FOAM_SRC/lagrangian/intermediate/submodels/Kinematic/ParticleForces/Drag/SphereDrag Last edited by joshwilliams; August 17, 2022 at 12:50. |
||
August 17, 2022, 12:08 |
|
#9 |
New Member
Emad S
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 4 |
Thanks!
This was very illustrative. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Solver for lagrangian particles in a Filter with coalescence in the Fibres? | SimonStar | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 0 | April 30, 2020 05:44 |
which solver for particle tracking through a fluid for lagrangian based method? | ranasa | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | August 9, 2014 04:09 |
thobois class engineTopoChangerMesh error | Peter_600 | OpenFOAM | 4 | August 2, 2014 10:52 |
solver stop problem in Lagrangian Particle Tracking | sakurabogoda | CFX | 3 | October 5, 2012 07:09 |
Working directory via command line | Luiz | CFX | 4 | March 6, 2011 21:02 |