|
[Sponsors] |
May 30, 2022, 11:06 |
Lagrangian Particle OpenFOAM
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 4 |
Hello. I made a simulation of the motion of Lagrangian particles using the "particleFoam" solver. Each particle was counted separately and then I put them on one graph. It seems to me that I got the wrong trajectories because the particles practically do not rise along the "x" axis. What could be the mistake?
P,S, At the beginning I counted the inviscid gas using "rhoCentralFoam". Then I took the velocity and density distribution and worked with the "particleFoam" solver. |
|
June 9, 2022, 09:13 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Josh Williams
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Scotland
Posts: 113
Rep Power: 5 |
Have you tried running the simulation with "coupled" as true? I think this is the issue.
|
|
June 13, 2022, 14:43 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 4 |
thanks for the reply. I consulted with some people and realized that I got a fairly correct result. And what is the "coupled" setting. And what it affects. When I ran the simulation with "true" I didn't get the change.
|
|
Tags |
lagrangian particle, openfoam, particlefoam, rhocentralfoam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lagrangian data - particle velocity post processing | Ake | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 13 | October 16, 2024 14:14 |
Lagrangian particle tracking cannot be run in parallel for the cases with AMI patches | Armin.Sh | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | March 28, 2021 23:33 |
Lagrangian Particle, first particle integration step wrong dt and age? | Sverre Magnus | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 0 | February 13, 2020 06:39 |
Post processing of Lagrangian particle field | marialhm | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 0 | October 8, 2017 23:02 |
New OpenFOAM Forum Structure | jola | OpenFOAM | 2 | October 19, 2011 07:55 |