|
[Sponsors] |
Why do we need to specify k omega on wall surface by using komega sst model |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Hui Zhang
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Hi foamers,
I am a fresh guy in openfoam. Recently, i started with flow past cylinder. And when I set the parameters of k and omega for the inlet and wall surface, some confusions came into my mind. why we need to set wall surface omega and k? They should be calculated by openfoam. Also, for the pressure boundary condition, near wall, I set zerogradient by following the tutorials, but for stagnation point, there is a nonzero gradient near wall surface. I do not understand, can you guys help me explain? Thank you a lot. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 8 ![]() |
can you share your 0-dict files?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
Hui Zhang
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Thanks for your reply!
The following is my 0-dict files PHP Code:
PHP Code:
PHP Code:
PHP Code:
PHP Code:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 8 ![]() |
at walls you can use wall function from the turbulence models:
for k for example you can use: wallName { type kqRWallFunction; value $internalField } there are also wall functions available for epsilon or nut ... check out this document: http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/~hani/kur...nfoamFinal.pdf |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Mikko
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Posts: 243
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
Hi Hui,
Just like for the other transport equations, you will need to specify boundary conditions for the k and omega. If you read the original papers by Menter et al, they also discuss about the boundary conditions. Best, Mikko |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
New Member
Hui Zhang
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Quote:
But for wall functions, we still need to specify a value for wall surface. Can you explain why the fixed valued is used, can we calculated it (I mean openfoam calculated it by some equations)? |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
New Member
Hui Zhang
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Quote:
Could you send the link or website to download this paper? best, Hui |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Mikko
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Posts: 243
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
Hi Hui,
For instance, this paper describes the boundary conditions. If you are looking which model exactly OpenFOAM uses then have a look at the comments in the kOmegaSST header file . |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 8 ![]() |
Quote:
for my case, i did conduct some test, to see how dependent my results would be with regards to initial values of turbulence properties. the result is, that the turbulence values will adjust themselves to correct values, if the time step initially is small enough. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
boundaries condition, flow past cylinder, komega sst model |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
One more time: wall functions - SST | CellZone | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 22 | June 11, 2021 13:27 |
Wrong multiphase flow at rotating interface | Sanyo | CFX | 14 | February 7, 2017 17:19 |
Basic Nozzle-Expander Design | karmavatar | CFX | 20 | March 20, 2016 08:44 |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 05:36 |
SST model with rough wall? | David | CFX | 4 | November 30, 2005 11:22 |