|
[Sponsors] |
November 21, 2018, 18:25 |
ForceCoeffs: U vs Umean
|
#1 |
Member
badoumba
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi everyone.
I know this question was more or less already asked but I didn't find clear answer. Simulating airflow around an airfoil, I have completely different Cl/Cd if I use normal coefficients (U, P) or mean version (an, PMean) - like 3.4 vs 2.7 I am using kepsilon SST, Steady State. Wich one of these sets should I use to get results closer to real values? Thank you guys. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unknown function type forces and forceCoeffs | richard.chung.jones | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 2 | June 21, 2022 09:53 |
Difference between forceCoeffs function and Paraview force calculation | alexey_sw | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 2 | June 9, 2021 05:05 |
[General] ParaView skips timeframe for UMean | Max0139 | ParaView | 1 | November 24, 2016 06:29 |
Adding forcecoeffs file to the controldict is causing pimpleDyMfoam to crash. | pruthvi1991 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | April 13, 2015 02:46 |
RNG diverged during the analysis the flow over a multi element airfoil, why? | s.m | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | August 5, 2013 09:39 |