|
[Sponsors] |
Regarding determinng the absolute hydrostatic pressure for air+water flow in a closed |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 18, 2018, 01:11 |
Regarding determinng the absolute hydrostatic pressure for air+water flow in a closed
|
#1 |
Member
ijaz fazil
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 73
Rep Power: 13 |
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thank you so much for answering my previous query. I have one more doubt. I need to run a simulation of a pipe (closed system) with rectangular cross-section. Water enters at 0.3 m/s but we are not sure about air so I used zeroGradient. Initially I find ref cell id for one cell in air inlet (from paraview) and set prefcell and prefvalue is zero (atmospheric pressure) but while running the simulation, after certain time the value changed to negative and the hydrostatic pressure at the bottom wall was in relative to the negative pressure. Since we wanted to get the exact pressure value to be provided to civil team, we set p_rgh to be fixed value (height chosen was inlet height), but what we noticed that immediately after the inlet there is a small shock like structure and there is a velocity and pressure drop. We are not sure whether to continue the run. Kindly please advise us, what to do to get the absolute pressure value on the bottom wall of the pipe? Regards Dr. Ijaz Fazil |
|
Tags |
hydrostatic, hydrostatic pressure, multiphase flow, openfoam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pressure for wave height in an Water Wave Tank | Cluain | CFX | 8 | December 6, 2021 04:58 |
sonicFoam - pressure driven pipe: flow continuity violation and waveTransmissive BC | Endel | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | September 11, 2014 17:29 |
Non-steady flow simplified for use in Vissim | steamerandy | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 31, 2011 22:08 |
hydrostatic pressure in bouyant flow | Atit | CFX | 3 | May 31, 2006 08:38 |
Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (long) | DS & HB | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 8, 2000 16:00 |