|
[Sponsors] |
On Darcy Navier-Stokes equations for Porous Media |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 5, 2017, 09:57 |
On Navier-Stokes Brinkman equations for Porous Media
|
#1 |
New Member
Omar Osama Mohamed
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 12 |
Hello Dear Foamers,
I apologize if this question which may have been answered before but I can't figure out yet how to solve this issue. I am trying to modify the momentum equation by adding a source term such K*U but I would like to model this constant (K) as a tensor (Matrix 3X3). Any idea how to perform this ? Also, how will OpenFoam deal with this ? as far as I know, it solves in a segregated manner so : will it solve implicitly for one componenet of the velocity and used explicit values for the rest ? i.e, K11*Up(n+1)+K12*Vp(n)+K13*Wp(n) then K21*Up(n+1)+K22*Vp(n+1)+K23*Wp(n) and finally K31*Up(n+1)+K32*Vp(n+1)+K33*Wp(n+1) where Kij is the component of the tensor, n is the iteration number and Up,Vp and Wp stands for the velocity components at the specified cell / control volume. Also, I will be highly grateful if anyone can let me know where in the documentation or links to find the detailed way openFoam calculates the ap and H(U). Respectfully, -Omar Last edited by Omarspace; July 5, 2017 at 11:27. Reason: mistake in the title |
|
Tags |
brinkman, darcy flow, filteration, openfoam 2.0.x, porous media flow |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how to solver perturbation equations of navier stokes equations ? | mechy | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 1 | June 8, 2014 18:04 |
Navier stokes compresible viscid flow fea, somebody can help? | Jose Choy | Main CFD Forum | 3 | October 24, 2003 03:28 |
Navier Stokes Equations | J.J. | Main CFD Forum | 2 | June 29, 2000 10:31 |
help: I am trying to solve Navier Stokes compressible and viscid flow | Jose Choy | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 18, 2000 06:45 |
Computational complexity of Navier Stokes equations | Marco Ellero | Main CFD Forum | 5 | May 5, 1999 22:07 |