|
[Sponsors] |
June 17, 2017, 06:03 |
Aeration Simulation
|
#1 |
New Member
Arash
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello,
I want to simulate the effects of aeration (using air bubble) on stratified dam reservoirs by using OpenFoam. The simulation is imposed on a 2 dimensional vertical field and the purpose is to obtain the velocity field. I would be so grateful if you could kindly help me in selecting an appropriate solver in OpenFoam to tackle this problem. Best regards, |
|
June 17, 2017, 06:41 |
|
#2 |
Member
Brian Willis
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 58
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello Arash
To capture two phase effects in a simulation of a real life dam size problem, I would suggest you look at twoPhaseEulerFoam solver. The other option is interFoam, though I suspect the necessary mesh size will be too large to capture aeration effects which you desire. Though I see it is a 2-D problem, so then interFoam could be an option, though capturing many bubbles becomes very computational intensive. Have a look at the twoPhaseEulerFoam tutorials (bubble column) and the interFoam ones such as the weir Over Flow to determine which will best suite your needs. Regards, Brian |
|
June 17, 2017, 09:55 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Arash
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
Thank you Brian for your kind help and attention. Sent from my iPhone using CFD Online Forum mobile app |
||
August 4, 2017, 14:05 |
|
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
I have to simulate a 3D aeration tank with a residence time around 2.5 hours. What's the best choice for such as large time scale? Cheers, Antonio |
||
August 8, 2017, 07:18 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 292
Rep Power: 14 |
||
November 6, 2020, 12:43 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Farzad Faraji
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 206
Rep Power: 8 |
Dear Friends
I am simulating aerator in a large tank. Since I am simulating both aerator and large tank at the same time, I want to use the same mesh size all over the domain to avoid different timescales(eg if I use smaller mesh for aerator, my time step will be much smaller). To do so, I have used fvOptions to generate a source of momentum to push the water out of the channels and also suck the water to the aerator(You can see it as a red cylindrical momentum source). I have done all aforementioned things using pimplefoam(I am just working with water instead of water and air mixture), but my simulation is instable. Now, I have two questions; 1- How can make it stable? 2- Is there any other way I can simulate the outlet of the channels without considering the aerator chamber? If so, what is happening to continuity equation? since mass increases inside the domain without any outlet. 3- Do you have any other suggestion for me? Thanks, Farzad |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Surface Source - Fixed Temperature? | robtheslob | FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM | 18 | May 12, 2017 03:28 |
Simulation FPEs - turbulence for transient and steady-state? | DaveR | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | March 5, 2017 16:06 |
Waterbell Simulation | o.b.m | Fluent Multiphase | 1 | November 5, 2015 06:55 |
setting up a simulation with multiple interactions | phandy | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | October 6, 2014 04:16 |
Continuous vs interrupted simulation | sega | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | November 3, 2008 15:29 |