|
[Sponsors] |
Polyhedra - cells with multiple inbetween faces |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
Dear all,
I converted a Fluent 3-D hex/polyhedral mesh using the fluent3DMeshToFoam utility. The domain has a rotational part and a stationary part with interfaces between them. I am using OF 3.0.1. The conversion itself runs fine. However, when I use checkMesh, I get the following output (abbreviated): Code:
Checking topology... Boundary definition OK. Cell to face addressing OK. Point usage OK. <<Found 32 neighbouring cells with multiple inbetween faces. Upper triangular ordering OK. <<Writing 64 unordered faces to set upperTriangularFace Face vertices OK. *Number of regions: 2 The mesh has multiple regions which are not connected by any face. <<Writing region information to "0/cellToRegion" <<Writing region 0 with 647222 cells to cellSet region0 <<Writing region 1 with 785034 cells to cellSet region1 Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces... Patch Faces Points Surface topology ns_wall 27528 27676 ok (non-closed singly connected) ns_impeller-ns_stationary 2220 2368 ok (non-closed singly connected) ns_impeller-ns_rotational 31220 52564 ok (non-closed singly connected) ns_baffles 12712 12784 ok (non-closed singly connected) ns_surface 7669 7808 ok (non-closed singly connected) AMI1 23686 46822 ok (non-closed singly connected) AMI2 18241 18316 ok (non-closed singly connected) Checking geometry... Overall domain bounding box (-0.689845 -0.298263 -0.689845) (0.689845 1.13 0.689845) Mesh has 3 geometric (non-empty/wedge) directions (1 1 1) Mesh has 3 solution (non-empty) directions (1 1 1) Boundary openness (-9.01689e-17 4.19045e-16 3.36408e-16) OK. Max cell openness = 3.04687e-16 OK. Max aspect ratio = 18.8908 OK. Minimum face area = 4.62885e-08. Maximum face area = 0.000518877. Face area magnitudes OK. Min volume = 1.44049e-09. Max volume = 4.69178e-06. Total volume = 1.98718. Cell volumes OK. Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 50.5215 average: 9.01362 Non-orthogonality check OK. Face pyramids OK. Max skewness = 1.45756 OK. Coupled point location match (average 0) OK. Mesh OK. I should say that I ran a couple of simulation using MRF (simpleFoam) as well as moving mesh (pimpleDyMFoam) and all the results seem to be all right. So really, there is maybe no need to worry about it but it would be great if someone could shed some more light on the meaning of the lines. Any input would be appreciated. Best, Zbynek |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Hi Zbynek! Did you find an answer to that after all?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
FUJIAN
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
hi! have u find out the meaning of that?
I also get the same warnings recently. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh sticking point | natty_king | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | February 20, 2024 09:12 |
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap | bobburnquist | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | August 26, 2015 09:38 |
snappyhexmesh remove blockmesh geometry | philipp1 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | December 12, 2014 10:58 |
foam-extend_3.1 decompose and pyfoam warning | shipman | OpenFOAM | 3 | July 24, 2014 08:14 |
[Commercial meshers] fluentMeshToFoam multidomain mesh conversion problem | Attesz | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 12 | May 2, 2013 10:52 |