CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

Non-newtonian/viscoelastic flow with heat transfer - which solver to use?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 8, 2017, 10:39
Default Non-newtonian/viscoelastic flow with heat transfer - which solver to use?
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 10
tdof is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I'm planning to simulate the flow of a nonlinear viscoleastic fluid with heat transfer as well as temperature dependent viscosity in OF Extend and I'm digging around to get all the information I need. To start, I'm running a few simulations with a shear thinning fluid using nonNewtonianIcoFoam, but it does not support heat transfer, is that right? I found a few links showing how to implement heat transfer in icoFoam, so I recon it is possible to do the same with nonNewtonianIcoFoam. Apparently, pisoFoam and pimpleFoam (or was it simpleFoam?) support non-newtonian behaviour as well. But as my work progresses, I will need to switch to viscoElasticFluidFoam and I'll need the temperature dependent viscosity, but I haven't found if it supports temperature-dependent viscosity or not. Is there a solver that fits my need out of the box or is it necessary to build my own?
tdof is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 12, 2017, 05:34
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Tom Fahner
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Breda, Netherlands
Posts: 647
Rep Power: 32
tomf will become famous soon enoughtomf will become famous soon enough
Send a message via MSN to tomf Send a message via Skype™ to tomf
Hi,

A while (18 months?) ago I was asking myself the same question since I would maybe need to run a simulation of a nonNewtonian fluid with temperature dependent viscosity. I did not find a readily available model back than, but in the end the shear effects could be ignored for the project, so I did not investigate further.

I did decide that it would have been necessary to develop a new viscosity model, so I guess that would still be my conclusion.

Cheers,
Tom
tomf is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 12, 2017, 07:55
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 10
tdof is on a distinguished road
Hi,

it would be necessary to create a new solver combining viscoelastic fluid properties, heat transfer capabilities and temperature dependent viscosity. A member of the forum already did this, but unfortunately lost most parts of his data. So I guess I'll either adapt the models to the solvers or vice-versa, meaning combining existing solvers.
tdof is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 25, 2017, 04:02
Default viscoelastic
  #4
New Member
 
farhad
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 8
bfzah is on a distinguished road
Hello
How can I form a vortex in a square-shaped channel?
Or how can I see vortices?
In all the papers, a vortex pair is seen at the corners of the channel with the Giesekus model.
How can this be modeled with open foam?
what is the properties flow ?
B.C ?

please help me?

my Email: farhadhoseinbor@gmail.com
Telegram id: @bfzah
bfzah is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Solver for gas flow through porous media including heat transfer in OpenFOAM v3.0+ Germilly OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 May 10, 2024 08:37
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out saii CFX 12 March 19, 2018 06:21
Multiphase flow - incorrect velocity on inlet Mike_Tom CFX 6 September 29, 2016 02:27
Error - Solar absorber - Solar Thermal Radiation MichaelK CFX 12 September 1, 2016 06:15
Heat Transfer Coefficient in Compressible Flow 3D turbine cascade Karkoura CFX 0 March 10, 2011 16:35


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:49.