|
[Sponsors] |
May 5, 2016, 12:29 |
Crossing trains (moving mesh ?)
|
#1 |
New Member
Clement Mtrl
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi everybody,
I need to estimate the overpressure due to the passage of a train on the side of an other like in the picture attached. But I'm not really sure about the method I should use. First I was thinking about doing a steady state simulation of just one train and import this results (map fields) on the final analysis. In this last analysis I would impose a moving mesh and an interface between the 2 meshes (pimpleDyMFoam). But the width of my first analysis should be bigger than the distance between both trains and now I'm a bit confused about the methodology I should use. If someone know the guidelines I should use to estimate this pressure on the door I will be very thankful. Have a good day EDIT : I searched for this kind of case (2 objects moving) and I didn't find anything. Maybe just one train moving twice the speed and a velocity of 1 time the speed for the whole system ?? |
|
May 14, 2016, 18:20 |
|
#2 |
Member
Peter
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 73
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi,
Since you're looking for a steady state solution (not sure if this is actually the case in "real life"), then a moving mesh will not help you since you'll be getting a transient solution and, of course, never actually achieve steady state. Just set boundary conditions with the velocities of your trains and run your simulation - easy! Kind regards, Peter |
|
May 15, 2016, 20:51 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Clement Mtrl
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi Opedrofunk,
Thanks for your answer. Yes it could be a great idea but I really believe ther would be a big difference in steady state and transient solution. I will make the steady state but do you have an idea for the transient one ? Thanks |
|
May 16, 2016, 03:34 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Karl-Johan Nogenmyr
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Linköping
Posts: 279
Rep Power: 21 |
For the transient you can let one train stand still (in your mesh), while the other moves past. In front of the moving train you remove mesh layers (add/remove meshmodifier). In between the trains you can use GGI. This is doable with foam extend, but be prepared for programming your own mesh-class. See movingConeTopo tutorial. Probably you can do it well with OpenFOAM too, using AMI instead of GGI.
Kalle |
|
Tags |
crossing, moving mesh., openfoam, pimpledymfoam, train |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
decomposePar problem: Cell 0contains face labels out of range | vaina74 | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 37 | July 20, 2020 06:38 |
Gambit problems | Althea | FLUENT | 22 | January 4, 2017 04:19 |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow | vishwa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 24 | June 27, 2016 09:54 |
[snappyHexMesh] external flow with snappyHexMesh | chelvistero | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | January 15, 2010 20:43 |
Moving (structured) mesh | Jesper | CFX | 5 | February 2, 2007 04:43 |