CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

Crossing trains (moving mesh ?)

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 5, 2016, 12:29
Default Crossing trains (moving mesh ?)
  #1
New Member
 
Clement Mtrl
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 12
Clmkite is on a distinguished road
Hi everybody,

I need to estimate the overpressure due to the passage of a train on the side of an other like in the picture attached.

But I'm not really sure about the method I should use.

First I was thinking about doing a steady state simulation of just one train and import this results (map fields) on the final analysis.

In this last analysis I would impose a moving mesh and an interface between the 2 meshes (pimpleDyMFoam). But the width of my first analysis should be bigger than the distance between both trains and now I'm a bit confused about the methodology I should use.

If someone know the guidelines I should use to estimate this pressure on the door I will be very thankful.

Have a good day

EDIT : I searched for this kind of case (2 objects moving) and I didn't find anything. Maybe just one train moving twice the speed and a velocity of 1 time the speed for the whole system ??
Attached Images
File Type: png Sans titre.png (130.5 KB, 32 views)
Clmkite is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 14, 2016, 18:20
Default
  #2
Member
 
Peter
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 73
Rep Power: 11
opedrofunk is on a distinguished road
Hi,
Since you're looking for a steady state solution (not sure if this is actually the case in "real life"), then a moving mesh will not help you since you'll be getting a transient solution and, of course, never actually achieve steady state. Just set boundary conditions with the velocities of your trains and run your simulation - easy!
Kind regards,
Peter
opedrofunk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 15, 2016, 20:51
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Clement Mtrl
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 12
Clmkite is on a distinguished road
Hi Opedrofunk,

Thanks for your answer. Yes it could be a great idea but I really believe ther would be a big difference in steady state and transient solution. I will make the steady state but do you have an idea for the transient one ?

Thanks
Clmkite is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 16, 2016, 03:34
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Karl-Johan Nogenmyr
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Linköping
Posts: 279
Rep Power: 21
kalle is on a distinguished road
For the transient you can let one train stand still (in your mesh), while the other moves past. In front of the moving train you remove mesh layers (add/remove meshmodifier). In between the trains you can use GGI. This is doable with foam extend, but be prepared for programming your own mesh-class. See movingConeTopo tutorial. Probably you can do it well with OpenFOAM too, using AMI instead of GGI.

Kalle
kalle is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
crossing, moving mesh., openfoam, pimpledymfoam, train


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
decomposePar problem: Cell 0contains face labels out of range vaina74 OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 37 July 20, 2020 06:38
Gambit problems Althea FLUENT 22 January 4, 2017 04:19
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow vishwa OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 24 June 27, 2016 09:54
[snappyHexMesh] external flow with snappyHexMesh chelvistero OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 11 January 15, 2010 20:43
Moving (structured) mesh Jesper CFX 5 February 2, 2007 04:43


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:50.