CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

why pimple foam used under relaxation in all iteration of pimple Loop ?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree28Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 6, 2016, 11:25
Default
  #21
New Member
 
Stefan
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 11
StefanW is on a distinguished road
Hey Guys,

could somebody please explain me the difference according the relaxationFactors using:

equations
{
"(U|k|omega)" 0.3;
}

or using:
equations
{
k 0.3;
omega 0.3;
U 0.3;
}

Are the one solved implicit and the others explicit ??

But I thought equations are always solved implicit?

And what is the advantage ? Could you please help me out?

Thanks a lot
StefanW is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 7, 2016, 02:47
Default
  #22
Senior Member
 
akidess's Avatar
 
Anton Kidess
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,377
Rep Power: 30
akidess will become famous soon enough
The advantage is that you can tune all three equations with one change instead of three. It's pure convinience. You'll see that notation in other places too.
__________________
*On twitter @akidTwit
*Spend as much time formulating your questions as you expect people to spend on their answer.
akidess is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 7, 2016, 04:19
Default
  #23
New Member
 
Stefan
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 11
StefanW is on a distinguished road
Hi Akidess,

thanks for your quick reply.

That helps a lot.

Best Regards

Stefan
StefanW is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 7, 2016, 04:43
Default
  #24
Senior Member
 
RodriguezFatz's Avatar
 
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27
RodriguezFatz will become famous soon enough
Hey Stefan, but normally you don't need such low under-relaxation factors for the turbulent paramters.
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower.
RodriguezFatz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 7, 2016, 04:47
Default
  #25
New Member
 
Stefan
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 11
StefanW is on a distinguished road
Hey Rodriguez,

thanks for your comment.

I know they are a little bit rough. So I will try step by step to enlarge them.
Sadly I got a really dynamic problem which colapses without underrelaxation.

Lets see how far i can bring them

Regards
Stefan
StefanW is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 7, 2016, 05:04
Default
  #26
Senior Member
 
RodriguezFatz's Avatar
 
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27
RodriguezFatz will become famous soon enough
Good luck
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower.
RodriguezFatz is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[blockMesh] error message with modeling a cube with a hold at the center hsingtzu OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 2 March 14, 2012 10:56
[blockMesh] BlockMesh FOAM warning gaottino OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 7 July 19, 2010 15:11
NACA0012 geometry/design software needed Franny Main CFD Forum 13 July 7, 2007 16:57
[blockMesh] Axisymmetrical mesh Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing) OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 10 April 2, 2007 15:00
[Gmsh] Import gmsh msh to Foam adorean OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 24 April 27, 2005 09:19


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:17.