|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 | |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
HI,
I've got a problem understanding the implicit under-relaxation procedure of OPENFOAM. I understand that it used to insure diagonal dominance of the system Matrix, by dividing the diagonal by alpha, and adding an explicit source term to the equation. The problem that I am having is, that in the CODE of OPENFOAM there stands something like: Quote:
My be some one can help me with this problem, or give me some hints for literature. Thanks |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
diagonal, openfoam, underrelaxation |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help. implicit discritization | dearboy | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 25, 2010 21:46 |
Can anyone explain the difference between these implicit concepts? | bearcat | Main CFD Forum | 0 | February 20, 2010 18:39 |
Euler (explicit or implicit) | anybody | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 8, 2006 02:12 |
how implicit is implicit? | Joe cool | Main CFD Forum | 7 | July 16, 2004 11:10 |
UDF : Chemical Reaction in Catalytic Converter | adhimac | FLUENT | 1 | March 27, 2001 14:04 |