|
[Sponsors] |
March 19, 2015, 06:38 |
|
#21 | |
Member
Howar
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
|
||
April 8, 2015, 17:57 |
|
#22 | |
New Member
Sihan Jin
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
Why do you say that Laminar and PaSR combustion models are not for multi-step combustion? Actually I have a problem simulating constant volume combustion using reactingFoam. My geometry is a box with ignition at the center and a 4 step mechanism of CH4 & air is implemented. It's filled with CH4 and air initially. Turbulence model is k-epsilon and I'm testing laminar and PaSR combustion model. It turns out that laminar works pretty good but PaSR doesn't work as what I expect. So could you pls help me figure out my problem? Sihan |
||
April 10, 2015, 05:45 |
|
#23 |
New Member
Ali Kadar
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Delft
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi Sehan,
You are correct, infact the Chalmers PaSR model is very similar to the successful EDC approach by Magnussen. It takes into account both the turbulent time scale and the chemical time scale while determining the reaction rate. The chemical timescale is determined by solving the reaction system’s ODEs fully coupled, and finding the characteristic time for that system. So it is meant to take into account a multi-step reaction mechanism. You can find more about PaSR here http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/~valeri/book-chapt7.pdf http://powerlab.fsb.hr/ped/kturbo/op...olmPhD2008.pdf http://web.ist.utl.pt/jose.neves.rod...2011-FINAL.pdf In the PaSR model the reaction rate is determined as reactionRate_PaSR = kappa*reactionRate_laminar kappa ~ 1 when t_chemical >> t_mix so your results with laminar and PaSR will be similar only when the rate is kinetics controlled and not mixing controlled(that is when the flow is laminar and reactions are slow). what is your reaction mechanism? Can you maybe send your case to me ?
__________________
A good solution is one which does justice to the inner nature of the problem- Cornelius Lanczos in a letter to Albert Einstein on March 9, 1947 |
|
April 10, 2015, 12:36 |
|
#24 | |
New Member
Sihan Jin
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
Thanks for your explanation. My problem is I keep adding energy, but the reaction rate is too small when I use PaSR model. Pls find my case in the attachment. --Sihan |
||
July 9, 2015, 06:50 |
|
#25 | |
Member
Howar
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
|
||
July 9, 2015, 07:09 |
|
#26 | |
Member
Howar
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
|
||
July 9, 2015, 08:37 |
|
#27 |
Senior Member
Freedom
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 209
Rep Power: 13 |
ReactingFoam maybe the choice for non-premixed flame. Just add reactions in the reaction dictionary.
Regards, Wen |
|
January 6, 2016, 08:18 |
|
#28 |
New Member
Tomladian Bucinara
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi Shian,
May you upload your 4-step reaction mechanism of CH4? I try to find it. thank you. Tom |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
reduced reaction mechanism for methane combustion using FLUENT | vnm | ANSYS | 1 | August 9, 2016 10:25 |
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end | xiuying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | August 27, 2013 16:33 |
Time step, Number of time step, Maxximum Iterations per time step | sandisk | FLUENT | 0 | July 18, 2011 03:57 |
Time step for combustion simulation | AdidaKK | CFX | 11 | December 3, 2009 12:47 |
Could anybody help me see this error and give help | liugx212 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | January 4, 2006 19:07 |