|
[Sponsors] |
why different models lead to different result for a same low-Re RAS case? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 10, 2012, 03:59 |
why different models lead to different result for a same low-Re RAS case?
|
#1 |
Member
sqing
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dalian
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi foamers,
I am simulating a 2D channel flow using pisoFoam solver. At the beginning, I used the LaunderSharmaKE model to solve the case and I got a good reslut. Then I calculated the y+, u+ and u_tau() using plusPostRANSUtility downloaded in the thread---"y+ and u+ values with low-Re RANS turbulence models: utility +testcase" However, the u_tau is higher than the value from the counterpart experiment. So I changed the model to LienLeschzinerLowRe to get a better result. However,the result didn't get better but worse than the former one. Now I want to know what are the factors that make the different reslut. Thanks for any reply. Sunxing |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turbulence Models for very low Reynolds Numbers | Sudhi | CFX | 1 | March 2, 2007 19:03 |
Free surface boudary conditions with SOLA-VOF | Fan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | September 9, 2006 13:24 |
Turbulent Flat Plate Validation Case | Jonas Larsson | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 2, 2004 11:25 |
FLUENT for low pressure case | Jim | FLUENT | 1 | March 30, 2004 13:11 |
Body force - Does it work? | Jan Rusås | CFX | 5 | August 27, 2002 10:50 |