|
[Sponsors] |
May 23, 2012, 09:11 |
AMI with linear translation motion
|
#1 |
New Member
macti
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello everybody,
I'm trying to simulate a linear translation motion of a solid body with OpenFOAM 2.1.0, in a turbulent flow (in 3D). I would like to use the AMI tool, to avoid the constraint of the mesh deformation while the body's motion. But I have a problem: it seems that there aren't interpolations between the two AMI that I use, and it produces strong errors at the interface, on all fields (p, U, k...). Do you know if this utilisation of the AMI could work? And if not, do you have any suggestion to manage to solve my problem? Thank you!! PS: I have attached two pictures, the first one is a 2D view of the mesh (the solid body which has to move to the top of the duct is situated at the right of the obstacle), the inlet flow is at the left; the second one is a view of the non-interpolation problem... |
|
September 29, 2013, 06:58 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
stephane sanchi
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 314
Rep Power: 18 |
Hi,
did you solved your problem ? I would like to compute same kind of flow. Best regards, Stephane. |
|
June 27, 2017, 12:05 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi,
I've also the same problem, someone have a solution? thanks |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Natural convection in a closed domain STILL NEEDING help! | Yr0gErG | FLUENT | 4 | December 2, 2019 01:04 |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 07:20 |
Mesh motion with Translation & Rotation | Doginal | CFX | 2 | January 12, 2014 07:21 |
solution diverges when linear upwind interpolation scheme is used | subash | OpenFOAM | 0 | May 29, 2010 02:23 |
translation motion | Zxi Toh | CFX | 2 | March 15, 2004 12:00 |