|
[Sponsors] |
The simulation does not match the results in the article |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 20, 2024, 05:12 |
The simulation does not match the results in the article
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 2 |
Hi, everyone!
I'm new member in OpenFOAM, currently simulating a stationary incompressible flow in a Tesla valve. Repeating the geometry (valve+2 cylinders) from the experimental article(https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/13/8/1180), I simulate the movement of the liquid and compare the pressure obtained with the results. But they don't add up. There was a hypothesis that it was necessary to grind the grid, but this does not help: I got to the difference of 2% between the simulation results, it seems to me that there is no point in grinding further. The results are still 2-3 times less than expected. I tried to take the articles that these scientists took as a basis, but still the results are much less. I multiply the resulting pressure by the density of the liquid, because I use incompressible solver. I wrote the boundary conditions below, but I don't see any errors in them: Velocity: Code:
FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class volVectorField; object U; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform (0 0 0); boundaryField { inlet { type fixedValue; value uniform (-1.25 0 0); } outlet { type zeroGradient; } wall { type noSlip; } front { type noSlip; } back { type noSlip; } } // ************************************************************************* Code:
FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class volScalarField; object p; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 0; boundaryField { inlet { type zeroGradient; } outlet { type fixedValue; value uniform 0; } wall { type zeroGradient; } front { type zeroGradient; } back { type zeroGradient; } } |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
simpleFoam: Influence of MRF region dimensions on simulation results | Krao | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | March 29, 2022 22:33 |
Difference between 2D and 3D simulation results | Tuck | FLUENT | 2 | January 9, 2021 18:43 |
Imprecise results in SU2 Simulation of a Turbulent Susbonic Round Jet | LucaLamberti | SU2 | 1 | May 25, 2020 00:47 |
Ahmed body simulation gives unexpected results in su2 6.0 | anas651 | SU2 | 0 | March 28, 2018 04:42 |
Experimental results do not match with simulation results | robingilbert | OpenFOAM Verification & Validation | 4 | January 23, 2012 18:39 |