|
[Sponsors] |
April 15, 2012, 11:48 |
simpleFoam for laminar pipe parabolic flow
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Goutam Saha
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 131
Rep Power: 15 |
Dear All,
I am trying to add parabolic flow at the inlet. The p and U files are given below. I am not getting satisfactory results. Can anyone tell me where is the problem. FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class volScalarField; object p; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 0; boundaryField { inlet { type fixedValue; value uniform 0; } outlet { type zeroGradient; } Walls { type zeroGradient; } } --------------------------- FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class volVectorField; object U; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * // dimensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform (0 0 0); boundaryField { inlet { type codedFixedValue; value $internalField; redirectType ramp; code #{ scalar U_0=0.001934; scalar r=0.02595; fixedValueFvPatchVectorField myPatch(*this); forAll(this->patch().Cf(),i) { myPatch[i]=vector(2*U_0*(1-Foam:ow(this->patch().Cf()[i].x(),2)/pow(r,2)),0,0); } operator==(myPatch); #}; } outlet { type zeroGradient; } Walls { type fixedValue; value uniform (0 0 0); } } |
|
April 24, 2012, 19:38 |
|
#2 |
New Member
kallone
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi Goutam,
I am also modeling laminar 3D pipe flow. I've found that a poor quality mesh can lead to results that do not match the analytical solution. You may want to try refining your mesh and see if that helps. Also I would suggest switching your inlet and outlet pressure BCs. |
|
April 25, 2012, 08:08 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Goutam Saha
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 131
Rep Power: 15 |
Dear Kallone,
I have checked my mesh and its fine. Since, I am using parabolic BC at the inlet, so I am expecting the same pattern throughout the length and constant centerline velocity profile. I am not getting this at all. I didn't find the problem. Did you get the correct result ??? Thanks. Goutam Last edited by Goutam; April 25, 2012 at 10:02. |
|
April 25, 2012, 10:02 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Goutam Saha
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 131
Rep Power: 15 |
I am using simpleFoam solver. Please see the attached file. I attached all the files that is necessary to run the problem.
Thanks Goutam |
|
April 25, 2012, 10:08 |
|
#5 |
New Member
April
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi Goutam,
I am using a constant velocity profile at the inlet but obtain correct results for this scenario using SimpleFoam. Have you tried switching the pressure BCs? That is, specify p = 0 at the outlet and zero gradient at the inlet. You cannot fix both the velocity and the pressure at the inlet at the same time. |
|
April 25, 2012, 10:16 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Goutam Saha
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 131
Rep Power: 15 |
hi april
I have used a constant velocity at the inlet and I also got the correct results using simpleFoam. I will change the pressure Bcs and hope it will work !!! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problems with simpleFoam with flow in pipe | fsalvucci | OpenFOAM | 6 | April 17, 2012 09:31 |
simpleFoam Blows up with Parabolic Inlet Pipe Flow | swahono | OpenFOAM | 0 | December 6, 2010 20:37 |
Turbulence intensity in fully devloped pipe flow - Reference | Shocktrain | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 14, 2010 07:58 |
About Turbulence Intensity (Pipe flow assimilated) | gRomK13 | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 10, 2009 04:11 |
Turbulence in a pipe flow | JM | Main CFD Forum | 4 | December 21, 2006 05:04 |