|
[Sponsors] |
February 24, 2012, 16:42 |
*.relax() in bubbleFoam (piso)?
|
#1 |
Member
Jeong Kim
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 16 |
I don't understand what the role of .relax() is in the bubbleFoam.
UEqns.H: UaEqn.relax() pEqns.H: p.relax() alphaEqn.H alpha.relax() Does .relax() mean a relaxation factor? the bubbleFoam solver used in OF1.7 adopts the "PISO" algorithm. This algorithm does not need any relaxation factor for solving U, alpha and p. Please enlighten me with you comments. Thanks. |
|
February 28, 2012, 03:33 |
|
#2 |
Member
Rob
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 15 |
If you use PIMPLE you can use relaxation factors. The PISO algorithm (in my opinion) does not have the possibility of relaxation in bubbleFOAM.
So if nOuterCorrectors is > 1 you use PIMPLE and additionally you can optionally use relaxation. |
|
February 28, 2012, 11:41 |
|
#3 |
Member
Jeong Kim
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 16 |
I'm using OF 1.7.1 so the bubbleFoam solver adopts "PISO". Do you mean p.relax()/UaEqn.relax()/alpha.relax() do nothing?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PISO Details | Dr B.M. Smith (Smith) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 17 | November 17, 2009 12:31 |
Development of a Low mach PISO solver | nishant_hull | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 0 | August 25, 2009 13:48 |
SIMPLE and PISO | Aditya | Main CFD Forum | 5 | April 1, 2006 19:52 |
PISO - new questions | Benedikt Flurl | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 7, 2005 13:02 |
PISO vs. SIMPLE | benedikt flurl | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 14, 2005 07:54 |