|
[Sponsors] |
Different solutions comparing pisoFoam and interFoam |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 9, 2012, 09:19 |
Different solutions comparing pisoFoam and interFoam
|
#1 |
Member
Anja Miehe
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Freiberg / Germany
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello everybody,
I encounter problems in simulating some kind of pipe flow. My solution domain is given in domain.jpg and the boundaries are:
As I want to continue with a second phase inside this domain, I recalculated it using interFoam. Unfortunately, I obtain the result shown in figure velo_inter.png. The stream is not attaching. I do not really understand the difference. My case setup is: alpha1 Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: 2.0.1 | | \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.com | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class volScalarField; location "0"; object alpha; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ]; internalField uniform 0; boundaryField { roll_down { type zeroGradient; } roll_up { type zeroGradient; } air_cooling { type zeroGradient; } gap { type zeroGradient; } die { type zeroGradient; } outlet { type zeroGradient; } inlet { type fixedValue; value uniform 0; } frontAndBackPlanes { type empty; } } // ************************************************************************* // Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: 2.0.1 | | \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.com | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class volScalarField; location "0"; object p_rgh; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [ 1 -1 -2 0 0 0 0 ]; internalField uniform 0; boundaryField { roll_down { type zeroGradient; } roll_up { type zeroGradient; } air_cooling { type zeroGradient; } gap { type zeroGradient; } die { type zeroGradient; } outlet { type zeroGradient; } inlet { type fixedValue; value uniform 0; } frontAndBackPlanes { type empty; } } // ************************************************************************* // Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: 2.0.1 | | \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.com | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class volVectorField; location "0"; object U; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [ 0 1 -1 0 0 0 0 ]; internalField uniform ( 0.0358 0 0 ); boundaryField { roll_down { type rotatingWallVelocity; origin ( 0 -0.4225 0 ); axis ( 0 0 1 ); omega -0.0853; value uniform ( 0 0 0 ); } roll_up { type rotatingWallVelocity; origin ( 0 0.4225 0 ); axis ( 0 0 1 ); omega 0.0853; value uniform ( 0 0 0 ); } air_cooling { type fixedValue; value uniform ( 0.0358 0 0 ); } gap { type fixedValue; value uniform ( 0 0 0 ); } die { type fixedValue; value uniform ( 0 0 0 ); } outlet { type fixedValue; value uniform ( 0.0358 0 0 ); } inlet { type zeroGradient; } frontAndBackPlanes { type empty; } } // ************************************************************************* // Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: 2.0.1 | | \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.com | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; location "system"; object fvSchemes; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // ddtSchemes { default Euler; } gradSchemes { default Gauss linear; } divSchemes { div(rho*phi,U) Gauss limitedLinearV 1; div(phi,alpha) Gauss vanLeer; div(phirb,alpha) Gauss interfaceCompression; } laplacianSchemes { default Gauss linear corrected; } interpolationSchemes { default linear; } snGradSchemes { default corrected; } fluxRequired { default no; p_rgh; pcorr; alpha1; } // ************************************************************************* // Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: 2.0.1 | | \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.com | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; location "system"; object fvSolution; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // solvers { pcorr { solver PCG; preconditioner DIC; tolerance 1e-10; relTol 0; } p_rgh { solver PCG; preconditioner DIC; tolerance 1e-07; relTol 0.05; } p_rghFinal { $p_rgh; tolerance 1e-07; relTol 0; } U { solver PBiCG; preconditioner DILU; tolerance 1e-06; relTol 0; } } PIMPLE { momentumPredictor no; nCorrectors 3; nNonOrthogonalCorrectors 0; nAlphaCorr 1; nAlphaSubCycles 2; cAlpha 1; } // ************************************************************************* // Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: 2.0.1 | | \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.com | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; location "system"; object controlDict; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // application interFoam; startFrom latestTime; startTime 0; stopAt endTime; endTime 10; deltaT 0.00125; writeControl adjustableRunTime; writeInterval 0.2; purgeWrite 0; writeFormat ascii; writePrecision 6; writeCompression uncompressed; timeFormat fixed; timePrecision 6; graphFormat gnuplot; runTimeModifiable yes; adjustTimeStep yes; maxCo 0.9; maxAlphaCo 0.9; maxDeltaT 0.1; // ************************************************************************* // Does someone have an idea where this difference might come from? Thanks in advance, Anja |
|
May 11, 2012, 06:13 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Albrecht vBoetticher
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Zürich, Swizerland
Posts: 240
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello,
I am facing funny problems with alpha1 that didn't occur when OF 1.7.1 was used, so my intention is that using PIMPLE instead of PISO changes the situation. The problem occuring in other threads, too, is that if one has a simple outflow for example in a freeface channel, the alpha1 phase gets reflected at the outflow instead of leaving the domain. Any new hints? |
|
May 15, 2012, 03:10 |
|
#3 |
Member
Anja Miehe
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Freiberg / Germany
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello Albrecht,
I tried my case in 1.7.1 after your hint, but without success. The velocity field looks the same as above for InterFoam, but it was worth a try. Maybe I try to find something different from the outflow. Regards, Anja |
|
May 15, 2012, 05:29 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Albrecht vBoetticher
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Zürich, Swizerland
Posts: 240
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello Anja,
meanwhile I tried the outflow with: U: { type inletOutlet; inletValue uniform (0 0 0); } p_rgh: { type outletInlet; outletValue uniform 0; } alpha1: { type zeroGradient; } which works fine in interFoam of OF 2.0. In about 8 hours I can tell more if it works with interFoam OF 2.1 set back to PISO. If I am the only one with these differences between the versions I have to check my Ubuntu installation, maybe the last update caused some weired change. |
|
May 21, 2012, 05:07 |
|
#5 |
Member
Anja Miehe
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Freiberg / Germany
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello Albrecht,
I have tried the InletOutlet with my case in 2.1.0 and 1.7.1 . It is a bit better but not the desired result. When I have some free cores, I will try different methods in fvSchemes and / or the fvSolution. I post the velocity results in a picture below. How does your case go? Regards, Anja |
|
May 23, 2012, 07:16 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Albrecht vBoetticher
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Zürich, Swizerland
Posts: 240
Rep Power: 17 |
Ok turning old searching the cause of alpha1 being reflected at the outflow, I finally got it. Maybe this is a bug dependent on ubuntu version, but it is quite relevant. The difference between the two pictures below showing an outflow of a channel is only that I moved the grid from positive x quadrant to negative x quadrant. When the whol gid lies at a position that the x-coordinates are smaller than 0 the outflow works! Maybe this should be reported. I attatched the cases at my post in http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...tml#post362833 today (24.5.12)
Last edited by vonboett; May 24, 2012 at 12:21. |
|
May 25, 2012, 03:30 |
|
#7 |
Member
Anja Miehe
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Freiberg / Germany
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello Albrecht,
Thanks for the hint with negative x. Now I get the results from InletOutlet with outflow as well. The rest might really be fvSolution and fvSchemes. Regards, Anja |
|
June 13, 2012, 16:20 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Albrecht vBoetticher
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Zürich, Swizerland
Posts: 240
Rep Power: 17 |
Meanwhile I reproduced the bug as well on a Mac OSX 10.6.5 intel with OF 1.7.x.
The case showing the reflection at the outlet is attatched, again the error vanishes when moving the mesh by -7 m in x direction to the negative quadrant. The attachment skipped the polyMesh folder due to file size, yust create the folder and move the blockMeshDict located at constant in it. |
|
June 13, 2012, 17:12 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Albrecht vBoetticher
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Zürich, Swizerland
Posts: 240
Rep Power: 17 |
...with p_rgh zeroGradient at the outlet it works fine, tested in OF 1.7.x and in OF 2.1.x. Anyway I'd be happy for any explanation why a fixedValue 0 boundary condition for p_rgh causes phase reflection only if one translates the mesh location from negative x-coordinates to positive x-coordinates.
Last edited by vonboett; June 14, 2012 at 09:11. |
|
Tags |
icofoam, interfoam, pimplefoam, pisofoam, simplefoam |
|
|