|
[Sponsors] |
January 13, 2012, 09:28 |
Breaking of constraint conditions
|
#1 |
New Member
Ivan
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi, foamers!
I've faced a very strange problem while trying to calculate the 2DoF movement of a cuboid in a canal with interDyMFoam. Cuboid is half submerged in water and the inflow velocity in longitudinal direction ( X ) is 0.5 m/s. I use the constraint fixedLine in the vertical ( Z ) direction ( not to let the cuboid move downstream the canal ) and fixedAxis around Y-axis ( to let only the trim change ). For some time the constraint condition is satisfied, but after 2-3 seconds of model time, the object starts shifting downstream the canal ( along the X-axis ), and the shifting velocity is quite large. I see this movement in Paraview, but when I look at the log it reports that the body is moving not in the X-direction but in Z direction ( ! ). So, there are two questions: 1. Why the constraint condition is not satisfied after some time? 2. Why the log and the actual mesh movement ( in Paraview ) do not coincide. I use OpenFOAM 2.1.x, but this behavior can be seen in earlier versions too. I tried to make the same simulation in OF 1.6 ext , but it gave the similar result. I also tried using different constraint combinations, varying the relaxation factor and tolerance - still no effect. The only way I've found to reduce this movement is to increase the inertia moments ( ! ) ( But I can not understand, how they are connected. ) Has anybody faced such problems? Last edited by lt.quibbler; January 16, 2012 at 12:53. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wind turbine simulation | Saturn | CFX | 60 | July 17, 2024 06:45 |
Implementation of boundary conditions for FVM | Tom | Main CFD Forum | 7 | August 26, 2014 06:58 |
Water subcooled boiling | Attesz | CFX | 7 | January 5, 2013 04:32 |
Boundary conditions? | Tom | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 5, 2002 02:54 |
A problem about setting boundary conditions | lyang | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 19, 1999 19:29 |