|
[Sponsors] |
December 19, 2011, 10:49 |
MRFSimpleFoam and turbulence models
|
#1 |
New Member
Andrey
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello!
Can anybody explain why did high-Re turbulence models are used in all MRFsimplefoam cases( and even in cases that used GGI) tutorial? If I understand everything clearly than high-Re models used near-wall functions. In there turn, wall functions constructed on idea about exact type of the velocity profile and velocity value below 0 on the surface. If we talk about moving/rotating wall than there is some velocity on it surface and so we can't use near-wall functions, can we? Please, explain what did I miss in my talk?
__________________
Best regards, Andrey |
|
April 30, 2015, 06:40 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
M. Montero
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Madrid
Posts: 155
Rep Power: 17 |
Some doubt here. I am using OF2.3.x to simulate a wind turbine and strange results are obtained with activating turbulence. k and epsilon over the surface is not real.
|
|
Tags |
ggi, mrfsimplefoam, near wall functions, turbulence model |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MRFSimpleFoam amp Salome Meca | tommie | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | November 5, 2014 03:54 |
Convergence with MRFSimpleFoam | grugg | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | March 28, 2014 05:56 |
MRFSimpleFoam Tutorial | bastil | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 48 | August 1, 2012 11:00 |
MRFSimpleFOAM goes divergenced! | renyun0511 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | November 19, 2009 03:11 |
How can run MRFSimpleFoam with KOmegaSST turbulence model | waynezw0618 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | April 21, 2008 05:40 |