|
[Sponsors] |
LES channelFoam solver underpredicts friction factor |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 16, 2011, 21:47 |
LES channelFoam solver underpredicts friction factor
|
#1 |
New Member
Harley Klein
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 17 |
I am running a (periodic) pipe flow calculation using channelFoam and am unable to obtain an appropriate value for the friction factor. The case is wall-resolved, with wall-normal, span-wise and stream-wise cell dimensions (given in wall units) of 0.5, 30 and 50, respectively, with a growth rate of 1.2 within the prism layer. The Reynolds number in my test case is 50,000, and the length-to-diameter ratio, L/D, is equal to 6.
The Blausius relationship for the friction factor gives a value of f = 0.0022, but my calculation is giving a value of approximately 0.0016. I am using Alberto Passalacqua's implementation of the dynamic Smagorinsky model. Is there an inherent issue that I am overlooking in applying the dynamic model for a wall-resolved case such as this? I am using an unstructured mesh with wedges in the core and hexahedrons in the prism layers. I have tried several different LES models and filters and meshes, but nothing seems to improve the result. I am aware of the fact that the use of an unstructured, non-uniform mesh can be an issue given the non-commutative nature of the filters, but am not sure whether or not the underprediction of the wall shear stress is an expected consequence. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Any suggestions? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
L/Δ factor for LES mesh | faisal_durr | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | February 17, 2011 09:56 |
Converting RANS solver into LES | Chiara | Main CFD Forum | 5 | February 19, 2009 10:36 |
compressible two phase flow in CFX4.4 | youngan | CFX | 0 | July 2, 2003 00:32 |
Laminar solver? LES? or DNS? | Ray | Main CFD Forum | 5 | March 19, 2003 11:19 |
Setting a B.C using UserFortran in 4.3 | tokai | CFX | 10 | July 17, 2001 17:25 |