|
[Sponsors] |
April 29, 2011, 22:42 |
volume fraction = nan
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 16 |
The liquid phase volume fraction is too large during interDyMFoam run. What should I do?
Thanks, Centre of mass: (3.99998969769 0.199999365532 -0.00194121622769) Linear velocity: (-0.00807274666396 -0.000116891215473 -1.22736927321) Angular velocity: (-50.7400957943 -350.884852997 0.162897658258) Centre of mass: (3.99998969769 0.199999365532 -0.00194121622769) Linear velocity: (-0.00807274666396 -0.000116891215473 -1.22736927321) Angular velocity: (-50.7400957943 -350.884852997 0.162897658258) GAMG: Solving for cellDisplacementx, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 7.59907279221e-06, No Iterations 4 GAMG: Solving for cellDisplacementy, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 7.48199156032e-06, No Iterations 4 GAMG: Solving for cellDisplacementx, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 7.59907279221e-06, No Iterations 4 GAMG: Solving for cellDisplacementz, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 6.28747292815e-06, No Iterations 4 GAMG: Solving for cellDisplacementy, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 7.48199156032e-06, No Iterations 4 GAMG: Solving for cellDisplacementz, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 6.28747292815e-06, No Iterations 4 Execution time for mesh.update() = 14.83 s time step continuity errors : sum local = 4.34625791759e-11, global = 2.0984282934e-13, cumulative = -4.55449681311e-06 Execution time for mesh.update() = 14.84 s time step continuity errors : sum local = 4.34625791759e-11, global = 2.0984282934e-13, cumulative = -4.55449681311e-06 GAMGPCG: Solving for pcorr, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 7.16391976148e-06, No Iterations 8 time step continuity errors : sum local = 3.11362494258e-16, global = 5.34853518262e-18, cumulative = -4.55449681311e-06 MULES: Solving for alpha1 Liquid phase volume fraction = nan Min(alpha1) = -1.44928608738e+296 Max(alpha1) = 1.18486320879e+296 GAMGPCG: Solving for pcorr, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 7.16391976148e-06, No Iterations 8 time step continuity errors : sum local = 3.11362494258e-16, global = 5.34853518262e-18, cumulative = -4.55449681311e-06 MULES: Solving for alpha1 MULES: Solving for alpha1 Liquid phase volume fraction = nan Min(alpha1) = -9067.86973555 Max(alpha1) = 873794.676324 Liquid phase volume fraction = nan Min(alpha1) = -1.44928608738e+296 Max(alpha1) = 1.18486320879e+296 MULES: Solving for alpha1 MULES: Solving for alpha1 Liquid phase volume fraction = nan Min(alpha1) = -21395657433.6 Max(alpha1) = 3942543.65753 Liquid phase volume fraction = nan Min(alpha1) = -9067.86973555 Max(alpha1) = 873794.676324 MULES: Solving for alpha1 Liquid phase volume fraction = nan Min(alpha1) = -21395657433.6 Max(alpha1) = 3942543.65753 |
|
April 30, 2011, 01:01 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 16 |
after reducing time-step, tried both GAMG-PCG and DIC-PCG for solving pcorr and still cannot fix this. solution gives singularity when solving pcorr.
Centre of mass: (1.50001686526 0.499972308524 0.493779071806) Linear velocity: (0.00249152243223 -0.00491296145985 -0.845915059591) Angular velocity: (-8.1941654618 -6.9633990245 -0.737810296966) Centre of mass: (1.50001686526 0.499972308524 0.493779071806) Linear velocity: (0.00249152243223 -0.00491296145985 -0.845915059591) Angular velocity: (-8.1941654618 -6.9633990245 -0.737810296966) GAMG: Solving for cellDisplacementx, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 3.96337485906e-06, No Iterations 6 GAMG: Solving for cellDisplacementx, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 3.96337485906e-06, No Iterations 6 GAMG: Solving for cellDisplacementy, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 3.72427537902e-06, No Iterations 6 GAMG: Solving for cellDisplacementy, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 3.72427537902e-06, No Iterations 6 GAMG: Solving for cellDisplacementz, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 8.96207859635e-06, No Iterations 6 GAMG: Solving for cellDisplacementz, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 8.96207859635e-06, No Iterations 6 Execution time for mesh.update() = 17.76 s time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.01648889068e-10, global = 3.98753833131e-12, cumulative = 6.73971151269e-09 Execution time for mesh.update() = 17.74 s time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.01648889068e-10, global = 3.98753833131e-12, cumulative = 6.73971151269e-09 DICPCG: Solving for pcorr, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 9.96719754608e-07, No Iterations 255 DICPCG: Solving for pcorr, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 9.96719754608e-07, No Iterations 255 DICPCG: Solving for pcorr: solution singularity DICPCG: Solving for pcorr: solution singularity DICPCG: Solving for pcorr: solution singularity time step continuity errors : sum local = inf, global = inf, cumulative = inf DICPCG: Solving for pcorr: solution singularity time step continuity errors : sum local = inf, global = inf, cumulative = inf MULES: Solving for alpha1 MULES: Solving for alpha1 Liquid phase volume fraction = -inf Min(alpha1) = -inf Max(alpha1) = 1.83985404514e+287 Liquid phase volume fraction = -inf Min(alpha1) = -inf Max(alpha1) = 1.83985404514e+287 MULES: Solving for alpha1 MULES: Solving for alpha1 Liquid phase volume fraction = nan Min(alpha1) = -52.2330190268 Max(alpha1) = 29.9036740755 Liquid phase volume fraction = nan Min(alpha1) = -52.2330190268 Max(alpha1) = 29.9036740755 MULES: Solving for alpha1 MULES: Solving for alpha1 Liquid phase volume fraction = nan Min(alpha1) = -504.821905808 Max(alpha1) = 387.19735435 Liquid phase volume fraction = nan Min(alpha1) = -504.821905808 Max(alpha1) = 387.19735435 |
|
April 30, 2011, 12:33 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 16 |
At timestep=0, it works fine but iteration blows up at next timestep. DT=0.005s. I am posting a link to the image at t=0.
http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/mem...imestep-0.html Thank you for any response. |
|
April 30, 2011, 13:01 |
|
#4 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,982
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Hi Virtual-iCFD,
I only have a very limited understanding of how interFoam and interDyMFoam work, but basically here's what could be wrong:
Best regards, Bruno
__________________
|
|
April 30, 2011, 13:32 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi Bruno, thank you for your prompt response.
After reducing deltaT from 0.005s to 0.0025s and now I checkMesh the geometry and the new mesh now has some problems. I will try to fix it and post the progress here. Create time Create polyMesh for time = 0 Time = 0 Mesh stats points: 767593 faces: 2204098 internal faces: 2137246 cells: 719444 boundary patches: 6 point zones: 0 face zones: 0 cell zones: 0 Overall number of cells of each type: hexahedra: 701651 prisms: 3585 wedges: 0 pyramids: 0 tet wedges: 32 tetrahedra: 0 polyhedra: 14176 Checking topology... Boundary definition OK. Point usage OK. Upper triangular ordering OK. Face vertices OK. Number of regions: 1 (OK). Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces ... Patch Faces Points Surface topology sidewall 20480 20930 ok (non-closed singly connected) inlet 4096 4225 ok (non-closed singly connected) outlet 4096 4225 ok (non-closed singly connected) floor 10240 10465 ok (non-closed singly connected) ceiling 10240 10465 ok (non-closed singly connected) floatingObject 17700 19883 ok (closed singly connected) Checking geometry... Overall domain bounding box (-4 -2 -3) (8 3 4) Mesh (non-empty, non-wedge) directions (1 1 1) Mesh (non-empty) directions (1 1 1) Boundary openness (-7.93596913354e-16 2.25264336087e-16 1.5514796242e-15) OK. Max cell openness = 3.04515531184e-16 OK. Max aspect ratio = 4.39517096183 OK. Minumum face area = 4.29684081531e-05. Maximum face area = 0.0085458594. Face area magnitudes OK. Min volume = 1.240235887e-06. Max volume = 0.000640939455. Total volume = 418.630237694. Cell volumes OK. Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 55.9891415978 average: 3.848649819 Non-orthogonality check OK. Face pyramids OK. Max skewness = 2.29577137119 OK. Mesh OK. Time = 0.005 Checking geometry... Overall domain bounding box (-4 -2 -3) (8 3 4) Mesh (non-empty, non-wedge) directions (1 1 1) Mesh (non-empty) directions (1 1 1) Boundary openness (-7.83532651411e-16 2.26932595494e-16 1.54953377682e-15) OK. Max cell openness = 4.32512283352e-16 OK. Max aspect ratio = 4.20723431263 OK. Minumum face area = 4.2968408155e-05. Maximum face area = 0.00893658472989. Face area magnitudes OK. Min volume = 1.22476329522e-06. Max volume = 0.000668814291826. Total volume = 418.630237804. Cell volumes OK. Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 58.6431968444 average: 3.90508611734 Non-orthogonality check OK. ***Error in face pyramids: 3 faces are incorrectly oriented. <<Writing 3 faces with incorrect orientation to set wrongOrientedFaces Max skewness = 2.32252294916 OK. Failed 1 mesh checks. End |
|
May 2, 2011, 04:56 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Anton Kidess
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,377
Rep Power: 30 |
Your time step might still be too large. I'd aim for a maximum Courant number of 0.2 (deltaT = 1e-05 maybe? depends on your setup, which you have told us nothing about), and from there increase the time step a bit if it runs smoothly.
|
|
May 2, 2011, 20:45 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi Anton,
I greatly appreciate your reply. In fact, I have stopped working on this case due to its complex geometry to begin with and after several failed attempts over the last weekend. In fact, I've just started with a much simpler and different geometry mesh to see if I can get over with this issue. As you see from my log message below, now I encountered difficulty as my timestep is getting smaller and smaller. I've posted some setting for the information. http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...-non-stop.html I will try lower Co number at 0.2 and let you know the progress. |
|
June 9, 2015, 10:41 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 231
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi,
I am using interphaseChangeFoam and I did include T field to the solver. It is running with deltaT=1e-6 in tutorial geometry but it is running with so small time step and Courant Number (see below) in the wavy pipe geometry and after several time steps Courant Number becomes 1e+20... i do not understand why it is running in one case and not in another one? Code:
Courant Number mean: 1.49926e-28 max: 1.81888e-26 deltaT = 8.39642e-30 Time = 2.12243e-29 Max interFaceArea: 1.01863e-11 m2 Max Heat transfer coefficient: 951.326 W/m2/K DILUPBiCG: Solving for alpha1, Initial residual = 1.34882e-05, Final residual = 1.81609e-22, No Iterations 1 Max interFaceArea: 1.01863e-11 m2 Max Heat transfer coefficient: 951.326 W/m2/K Max Condensation Rate = 0.206548 kg/m3/s Total Condensation Rate = 3.88296e-08 kg/s Liquid phase volume fraction = 0.0001 Min(alpha1) = 0.0001 Max(alpha1) = 0.0001 PIMPLE: iteration 1 GAMG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 5.75304e-10, Final residual = 5.75304e-10, No Iterations 0 time step continuity errors : sum local = 3.59822e-28, global = -3.59822e-28, cumulative = -1.80246e+14 GAMG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 5.75304e-10, Final residual = 5.75304e-10, No Iterations 0 time step continuity errors : sum local = 3.59822e-28, global = -3.59822e-28, cumulative = -1.80246e+14 GAMG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 5.75304e-10, Final residual = 5.75304e-10, No Iterations 0 time step continuity errors : sum local = 3.59822e-28, global = -3.59822e-28, cumulative = -1.80246e+14 PIMPLE: iteration 2 GAMG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 5.75304e-10, Final residual = 5.75304e-10, No Iterations 0 time step continuity errors : sum local = 3.59822e-28, global = -3.59822e-28, cumulative = -1.80246e+14 GAMG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 5.75304e-10, Final residual = 5.75304e-10, No Iterations 0 time step continuity errors : sum local = 3.59822e-28, global = -3.59822e-28, cumulative = -1.80246e+14 GAMGPCG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 5.75304e-10, Final residual = 5.75304e-10, No Iterations 0 time step continuity errors : sum local = 3.59822e-28, global = -3.59822e-28, cumulative = -1.80246e+14 DILUPBiCG: Solving for T, Initial residual = 9.24264e-06, Final residual = 1.30498e-22, No Iterations 1 ExecutionTime = 20.05 s ClockTime = 20 s Courant Number mean: 1.79911e-28 max: 2.18266e-26 deltaT = 1.00757e-29 Time = 3.13e-29 Max interFaceArea: 1.01863e-11 m2 Max Heat transfer coefficient: 951.326 W/m2/K DILUPBiCG: Solving for alpha1, Initial residual = 1.748e-05, Final residual = 2.78871e-22, No Iterations 1 Max interFaceArea: 1.01863e-11 m2 Max Heat transfer coefficient: 951.326 W/m2/K Max Condensation Rate = 0.206548 kg/m3/s Total Condensation Rate = 3.88296e-08 kg/s Liquid phase volume fraction = 0.0001 Min(alpha1) = 0.0001 Max(alpha1) = 0.0001 PIMPLE: iteration 1 GAMG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 5.75304e-10, Final residual = 5.75304e-10, No Iterations 0 time step continuity errors : sum local = 4.31787e-28, global = -4.31787e-28, cumulative = -1.80246e+14 GAMG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 5.75304e-10, Final residual = 5.75304e-10, No Iterations 0 time step continuity errors : sum local = 4.31787e-28, global = -4.31787e-28, cumulative = -1.80246e+14 GAMG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 5.75304e-10, Final residual = 5.75304e-10, No Iterations 0 time step continuity errors : sum local = 4.31787e-28, global = -4.31787e-28, cumulative = -1.80246e+14 PIMPLE: iteration 2 GAMG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 5.75304e-10, Final residual = 5.75304e-10, No Iterations 0 time step continuity errors : sum local = 4.31787e-28, global = -4.31787e-28, cumulative = -1.80246e+14 GAMG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 5.75304e-10, Final residual = 5.75304e-10, No Iterations 0 time step continuity errors : sum local = 4.31787e-28, global = -4.31787e-28, cumulative = -1.80246e+14 GAMGPCG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 5.75304e-10, Final residual = 5.75304e-10, No Iterations 0 time step continuity errors : sum local = 4.31787e-28, global = -4.31787e-28, cumulative = -1.80246e+14 DILUPBiCG: Solving for T, Initial residual = 5.98267e-06, Final residual = 9.28524e-23, No Iterations 1 ExecutionTime = 24.43 s ClockTime = 25 s Courant Number mean: 2.15893e-28 max: 2.61919e-26 deltaT = 1.20908e-29 Time = 4.33909e-29 Thanks in advance! Kanarya |
|
June 12, 2015, 19:15 |
|
#9 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,982
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Quick answer: Sorry, but you've not provided enough information to diagnose anything Please follow the guidelines: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...-get-help.html
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
interDyMFoam - change in volume fraction | gopala | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | April 27, 2009 11:46 |
On the damBreak4phaseFine cases | paean | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | November 14, 2008 22:14 |
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file | SSL | FLUENT | 2 | January 26, 2008 12:55 |
[blockMesh] Axisymmetrical mesh | Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing) | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 10 | April 2, 2007 15:00 |
Could anybody help me see this error and give help | liugx212 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | January 4, 2006 19:07 |