|
[Sponsors] |
April 5, 2011, 12:10 |
ODE solver for reactingFoam
|
#1 |
New Member
Daero Joung
Join Date: May 2009
Location: POSTECH, Republic of Korea
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 17 |
I ran this test case with simple one step chemistry using different ODE Solvers(SIBS, KRR4, RK). I expected same result but it wasn't.
Maximum temperature is about 2252 K for SIBS, 1446 K for KRR4 and 2570 K for RK. test case : ReactingFoam/counterFlowFlame2D odeCoeffs { ODESolver RK; //SIBS, KRR4, RK eps 0.05; scale 1; } ================================================== ================ But Results for simple ODE show no difference. y" - y = 0 ; y(0) = 0, y'(0) = 1 SIBS : Numerical: y(1.0) = 2(1.175190 1.543074), hEst = 1.245250 KRR4 : Numerical: y(1.0) = 2(1.175212 1.543091), hEst = 0.186009 RK : Numerical: y(1.0) = 2(1.175180 1.543062), hEst = 0.665943 - ODEtest(test/ODETest.c) http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/~hani/kurser/OS_CFD_2008/ZongyuanGu/reportZongyuan.pdf - Cash-Karp Runge-kutta method in OpenFOAM http://ftp.eq.uc.pt/books/NumericalRecipes/f16-2.pdf Last edited by narak; April 7, 2011 at 13:02. |
|
April 13, 2011, 05:28 |
15 step chemistry results
|
#2 |
New Member
Daero Joung
Join Date: May 2009
Location: POSTECH, Republic of Korea
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 17 |
I ran the same tutorial test case with 39 step chemistry(C7H16) included in OF and got almost same results.
reactingFoam SIBS KRR4 RK T_max(K) 1892 1896 1901 dQ_max 0.128 0.130 0.133 *Ext t(s) 1818 1664 54497 * execution time for Time = 1 I don't know why 1 step chemistry showed different results yet, but it seems to run correctly with multi step chemistry including GRI 3.0. |
|
October 24, 2012, 16:34 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Mhsn
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 14 |
Regarding your post, you are familiar with using detailed reaction mechanisms (like GriMech 3.0) in OpenFoam. What I'm going to do is to simulate premixed combustion in a small channel using OpenFoam2.1.1. I wonder what solver to use and how to implement full chemistry. I mean, how I can solve conservation equations for all species. Any help would be appreciated.
|
|
November 16, 2012, 04:53 |
|
#4 | |
New Member
Traib
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
You can use reactingFoam, or a density based solver rhoRactingFoam. These are solver application for which the source codes can be easily found here http://www.openfoam.org/docs/cpp/. However, if you meant to ask for a chemistry solver then you can select from the chemestry models listed in the above site. As for solving the species transport and temperature equations, the solver applications you choose will do it for you. |
||
August 18, 2013, 10:13 |
ODEsolver
|
#5 |
Member
赵庆良
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi:
Foamers,Can someone tell me the way of ODE solvers what equation in reactingFoam?Is UEqn or hEqn? |
|
January 21, 2016, 12:43 |
band Chemistry Solver
|
#6 |
New Member
eidi
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello everyone,
I'm using full mechanism kinetic reaction in openfoam but the running time is so much. I need help to restrict the chemistry solver in the specific volume such az z=0.2:0.3, x=-0.01:0.01 and y=-0.01:0.01 i read the basicChemistrySolver but it solve the hole mesh. I'm using TFM model with LES in openFoam211 anyone can help me? |
|
March 6, 2016, 22:35 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Freedom
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 209
Rep Power: 13 |
Which solver do you use? The reactingFoam?
|
|
Tags |
ode, reactingfoam, solver |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ODE solver coefficients | mrangitschdowcom | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | August 18, 2013 23:16 |
Working directory via command line | Luiz | CFX | 4 | March 6, 2011 21:02 |
Problem implementing CVODE ODE solver | markusrehm | OpenFOAM | 20 | October 13, 2010 18:02 |
Creating New Solver: For particle-laden compressible jets | sankarv | OpenFOAM | 0 | April 4, 2010 19:06 |
why the solver reject it? Anyone with experience? | bearcat | CFX | 6 | April 28, 2008 15:08 |