|
[Sponsors] |
engine simulation with mesh motion and topological changes |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 22, 2011, 12:42 |
|
#41 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi Peter,
Is the solver you used compressible or incompressible? Is it for laminar or turbulent flow? Did you obtain accurate results? I am trying to use the compressible solver but it still won't work. Why don't you use the solvers provided in the extend version? I am not sure about the 1.5-ext version, but in the 1.6-ext there are solvers for turbulent and laminar flow, also compressible and incompressible, all with mesh motion and topological changes for ic-engines. Well here is a sample of my case, I ran it first with an incompressible solver, icoDyMEngineFoam, and got it working, but the results didn't seem to logical (I am trying to do a cold flow simulation). But this case is a compressible one with turbulence, ran with sonicTurbDyMEngineFoam, had to change the turbulence model to kOmegaSST because kEpsilon kept giving problems, perhaps you also have a suggestion there. Now I am stuck with this temperature error, looks like it diverges, can't get past the first iteration. Any Advice?? I posted the file in your ic-engine group in the extend-project community, since it was not small enough to fit here. the link is: http://www.extend-project.de/compone...ble-solver#163 best regards |
|
February 24, 2011, 07:30 |
|
#42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 140
Rep Power: 17 |
Sorry, I didn t read your post herer. Indeed it is strange.
I ve encountered difficulties in 1.6-ext with dieselFOAM and attachdetach meshmodifiers. My solver wont run with 1.6-ext. So far I succeed in doing the meshmotion class I ve spoken about. If you are interested let me know. Furthermore, I am about writting dieselEngineDyMFoam for 1.5-dev. It works but without valve closure (attachdetach approach) . I think I need to update the boundary conditions arter introducing the attachdetach faces. Any ideas? To your problem, try to downgrade to 1.5-dev, if you do not have 1.5-dev, I can test it for you. Peter |
|
February 24, 2011, 12:58 |
|
#43 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi Peter,
yeah I would appreciate it if you could try it with 1.5-dev. Maybe u can send me your code, let's see if I can catch the bug with the attachDettach by lookin at it |
|
February 26, 2011, 19:25 |
|
#44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 140
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi
I checked your case with 1.5-dev (without a turbulence model, laminar) and it worked. Peter |
|
February 26, 2011, 19:56 |
|
#45 |
Senior Member
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,907
Rep Power: 33 |
Hi Peter,
Sorry, I thought I've answered this, but it seems the response did not go through. I have fixed this in the preparation of the next release, but there is a bug in 1.6-ext that is causing you trouble. It is to do with the state of turbulence on newly created patches after detach, where I have no data to map from. Here is a quick fix for you: - go to the turbulence model you are using (I assume compressible k-e) - look for the beginning of the ::correct() function in kEpsilon.C - add the following two lines at the very beginning: k_.correctBoundaryConditions(); epsilon_.correctBoundaryConditions(); - recompile. Please let me know if it works. Apologies for the trouble, Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk |
|
February 27, 2011, 07:52 |
|
#46 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 140
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Mr. Jasak
Thank you very much for your reply. I ve added your lines in the turbulence model I am using. Your suggest was right with the compressible kepsilon model. Quote:
Quote:
Thanks in advance Peter |
|||
February 28, 2011, 18:44 |
|
#47 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 140
Rep Power: 17 |
I had a problem with my boundary conditions. I disabled all the wall functions.
Works now. Thank you very much again. Peter |
|
March 1, 2011, 10:27 |
|
#48 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi Peter,
Thanks for testing it. It worked with laminar solver in 1.6-ext too, but only up to 217 CAD :S. With turbulence model kOmega SST it gave some error when calculating temperature T, and kEpsilon didn't work, so I am going to make the changes proposed by Prof. Jasak and see what happens. Also, did the results you got look reasonable in this case or any of the others you have run? In my case, pressure is not changing!! So of course velocity doesn't change either, which is not very good because I am interesting in the cold flow... I will keep you posted of what happens |
|
March 7, 2011, 23:07 |
|
#49 | |
New Member
Josiah Xu
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
Hi Peter, How did you disable your wall functions? Change them into "fixedValue" or ...? I try the "fixedValue" BC for k and epsilon,but the janafError still exist. (I have added the two sentences which were provided by Prof. Jasak) Thank you! Josiah Last edited by faithhidy; March 8, 2011 at 02:04. |
||
March 10, 2011, 12:43 |
|
#50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 140
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Josia
I ve put everywhere zeroGradient. Peter |
|
March 15, 2011, 05:43 |
|
#51 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi Peter,
have you found a way to run the simulation without having to set zeroGradient all over after doing Prof. Jasak's modifications to kEpsilon and/or kOmegaSST ? I did the modifications on both, and I get the same error as you, it looks like the only way to get it to run is to set zeroGradient to all walls. |
|
March 15, 2011, 17:35 |
|
#52 |
Senior Member
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,907
Rep Power: 33 |
Hi Guys,
I just did a full day's work with a client doing internal combustion engines simulations in parallel with OpenFOAM and it all works fine. Can I please have one of the cases that is causing problem, because we've got the old gem: "it all works for me!" The case would be used to debug the problem and I am happy to delete if afterwards if you have concerns about sharing it further. I guess you know how to contact me - a Dropbox or similar file transfer would be best. Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk |
|
March 16, 2011, 06:42 |
|
#53 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello Prof. Jasak,
I have put together a copy of the simpleEngine case I am working with for you. So far, I think Everything works until I include the turbulence modeling. You can find the case under: http://cid-7756d13637c02835.office.l...mpleEngine.tar abm |
|
March 16, 2011, 07:44 |
|
#54 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 15 |
By the way, I am using OpenFOAM-1.6-ext, and the solver is sonicTurbDyMEngineFoam, I also tried the changes you suggested above to kEpsilon.C (kOmegaSST ran the same way with or without the changes, it crashed after a few iterations)
Best regards |
|
March 17, 2011, 02:21 |
|
#55 |
Senior Member
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,907
Rep Power: 33 |
Got it, thank you - I will keep you posted.
Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk |
|
March 22, 2011, 09:50 |
|
#56 |
Senior Member
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,907
Rep Power: 33 |
Hello again. I have fixed the problem and the two files you need are attached. I have also done a bit of clean-up in other parts of the library, but that will wait for the merge.
BTW, the case you gave me looks distinctly like someone playing with one of my old cases from ~2004 but it is really badly set up, with poor choice of discretisation schemes and boundary conditions. In any case, it works now... Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk |
|
March 22, 2011, 09:53 |
|
#57 |
Senior Member
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,907
Rep Power: 33 |
Missing attachments? Second attempt (apologies).
Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk |
|
March 23, 2011, 05:35 |
|
#58 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello abm,
Thanks for your case. I have studied it. First i run "moveDyMEngineMesh" to simulate and understand the mesh motion. But the case didn't run to the end. Regards, Ralph Time = 730 DICPCG: Solving for motionUx, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0 DICPCG: Solving for motionUz, Initial residual = 0.328438, Final residual = 6.0442e-11, No Iterations 13 DICPCG: Solving for motionUx, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0 DICPCG: Solving for motionUz, Initial residual = 4.00401e-11, Final residual = 4.00401e-11, No Iterations 0 Volume: new = 1.0007e-05 old = 9.99292e-06 change = 1.40833e-08 Motion continuity errors : sum local = 2.78751e-16, maximum = 9.5838e-15 ExecutionTime = 979.19 s ClockTime = 989 s Time = 730.2 --> FOAM FATAL ERROR: Face 2970 contains vertex labels out of range: 4(-1 -1 3917 3938) Max point index = 4048 From function polyMesh:olyMesh::resetPrimitives ( const Xfer<pointField>& points, const Xfer<faceList>& faces, const Xfer<labelList>& owner, const Xfer<labelList>& neighbour, const labelList& patchSizes, const labelList& patchStarts ) in file meshes/polyMesh/polyMesh.C at line 757. FOAM aborting |
|
March 23, 2011, 05:46 |
|
#59 |
Senior Member
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,907
Rep Power: 33 |
Yes - as I said, the case is badly set up. Go to the last time you have available and you will see that the layer addition/removal interface on the piston has ruined the last mesh layer - compare that with the mesh at the beginning and you will see what happened.
To fix this, you need to either adjust the stroke OR change the min and max layer thickness in the mesh modifier. As a matter of fact, I got worried about this 2 days ago before I saw the error in setup, but this is all it is: poor setup. The code is correct and has been re-checked by the author (= me!) Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk |
|
March 23, 2011, 11:20 |
|
#60 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi Prof. Jasak,
Thanks for the fix. kEpsilon works now, although it stops at around 430 CAD (as soon as the exhaust valve opens). But as you mention, I still need to set up the case correctly so hopefully that will get the case running smoothly . With the kOmegaSST model the simulation fails at the first iteration :S. In debug mode, the error is: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00002b3a7a460dfa in Foam::fvPatchField<double>::db (this=0x163b0190) at /home/albertom/software/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-1.6-ext/src/finiteVolume/lnInclude/fvPatchField.C:160 160 return patch_.boundaryMesh().mesh(); @RalphS: Indeed the case definitely does not have the best setup. I took this case from the internetnet, it came with a solver called icoDyMFoamEngine, which doesn't work in the current version of OpenFOAM any more. So many of the setup comes from that case, and for now I am trying to make it work with the current version of OpenFOAM ext, and with a compressible solver and turbulence modeling as well Also my experience is a bit limited, but as soon as I get to optimize the case, I guess that will change In the meantime, any suggestions will be very helpful, I am still new to ICE simulation. |
|
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-solving/83177-engine-simulation-mesh-motion-topological-changes.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
Untitled document | This thread | Refback | February 4, 2014 12:36 |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dynamic moving mesh | Pei-Ying Hsieh (Hsieh) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 64 | June 7, 2012 11:04 |
engine simulation with mesh motion and topological changes | abminternet | OpenFOAM | 0 | December 16, 2010 12:47 |
[Commercial meshers] Good mesh for pistoncylinder application | Serkan Cetin | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 4 | November 3, 2010 08:36 |
Radiation and miscellaneous enhancements | vtk_fan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | February 18, 2008 00:49 |
Valve action | Hrvoje Jasak (Hjasak) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | January 13, 2005 14:23 |