|
[Sponsors] |
October 19, 2010, 17:27 |
simpleSRFfoam : request for volVectorField U
|
#1 |
Member
Jean-Michel FONTAINE
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Orleans - France
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi everybody
I try to model a rotor in an open stream, using simpleSRFoam. The solvers returns : Code:
--> FOAM FATAL ERROR: request for volVectorField U from objectRegistry region0 failed available objects of type volVectorField are 1 ( Urel ) From function objectRegistry::lookupObject<Type>(const word&) const in file /home/nous/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-1.7.1/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude/objectRegistryTemplates.C at line 139. Code:
internalField uniform (10 0 0); boundaryField { inlet { type fixedValue; inletValue uniform (10 0 0); relative no; value uniform (10 0 0); } outlet { type freestream; freestreamValue uniform (10 0 0); } rotor { type SRFVelocity; inletValue uniform (0 0 0); relative yes; value uniform (0 0 0); } cyclic { type cyclic; } } Code:
Urel { solver PBiCG; preconditioner DILU; tolerance 1e-05; relTol 0.1; } Thanks in advance Jean-Michel |
|
October 23, 2010, 14:02 |
[solved] simpleSRFfoam : request for volVectorField U
|
#2 |
Member
Jean-Michel FONTAINE
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Orleans - France
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello
My problem is solved : freeStream BC seems not to be compatible with simpleSRFFoam. fixedValue fixed the error Best wishes Jean-Michel |
|
October 29, 2010, 21:11 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
M. Montero
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Madrid
Posts: 155
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
I have problems with SRFsimpleFoam. My mesh is 3D, it is a 120º sector with cyclic condition. Continuity errors are increasing at each iteration. Could you share some information about bcs? Inlet, outlet, cyclic, wall and exterior fardfield? Thanks in advance |
|
July 28, 2015, 16:16 |
|
#4 |
Member
Werner
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: West Lafayette, USA
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi,
i'm experiencing the same issue with the request for volVectorField U as JMF. I'm following your advice to change the boundary conditions where there is freestream (with an exterior flow) from SRFFreestream to fixedValue and to zeroGradient and it still doesn't work. I think that the zeroGradient boundary condition is better since I don't have a wall in here. For the fixedValue BC's I should give the walls the same speed of the air, which must be very difficult. I think I might have to mention the volVectorField U somewhere since I eventually would want to have such vector field as a result. Are you sure that the solution to this problem relies only in the definitions of the boundary conditions ? I will attach the versions of the Urel that I have created. I have followed the SFRSimpleFoam/Mixer to set up the fvSolution and fvSchemes. I attach them here as well. I would apreciate any help. Regards, Werner |
|
January 21, 2019, 08:58 |
foam-extend 4.0
|
#5 |
New Member
Luis Fernando
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 13 |
Using the solver steadyCOmpressibleSRFFoam still find the error
request for volVectorField U from objectRegistry region0 failed available objects of type volVectorField are 4 ( UrelPrevIter Urot Urel Uabs ) ... I already changed the boundary conditions but is not working. Any idea? Regards |
|
July 24, 2019, 10:35 |
solved
|
#6 |
New Member
Luis Fernando
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello foamers
The issue appeared because at the inlet boundary condition of temperature did not specify the U field as Urel, therefore the solver did not find the value. THen, by specifying U as U rel the problem has been solved. Regards |
|
Tags |
boundary, field, srf, urel |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem with paraFoam | ata | OpenFOAM | 14 | November 30, 2009 05:23 |
Installation OF1.5-dev | ttdtud | OpenFOAM Installation | 46 | May 5, 2009 03:32 |
[OpenFOAM] Xwindows crash with paraview save | srinath | ParaView | 1 | October 15, 2008 10:37 |
Request to provide information | Sanjay Jain | FLUENT | 1 | December 31, 2007 06:40 |
Memory request | Giovanni | Siemens | 1 | September 10, 2001 13:21 |