|
[Sponsors] |
September 20, 2010, 11:29 |
Time dependent Maxwell equations
|
#1 |
New Member
Liberis
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello guys,
could someone give me a basic guidance on implementing in OpenFoam the system of time dependent Maxwell equations (e.g Microwave modeling,scattering etc ) . The system consists of time dependent electric field and magnetic field components. The mhdFoam solver I think is not able to perform such task. Please help! |
|
September 21, 2010, 09:18 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Liberis
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello again,
trying to solve the coupled system of Maxwell equation, for electric E and magnetic field H, i implemented the following solver, myMicro.C. My computational area is a cube ( 0.1m x 0.1m x 0.1m). On the left side of the cube (say inlet) I set a boundary condition oscillatingFixedValue for E and H in Oy and Oz direction respectively in order to take a wave propagation in Ox. The time step is very low 1e-13. After few iterations of the solver the wave stagnates, increases its value and the results are non physical at all... Any ideaaa!!! while (runTime.loop()) { Info<< "Time = " << runTime.timeName() << nl << endl; // #include "readPISOControls.H" // #include "CourantNo.H" tmp<fvVectorMatrix> EEqn ( epsilon0*fvm::ddt(E)==fvc::curl(H) ); // EEqn().relax(); EEqn().solve(); tmp<fvVectorMatrix> HEqn ( mu*fvm::ddt(H)== -fvc::curl(E) ); // HEqn().relax(); HEqn().solve(); |
|
September 23, 2010, 18:12 |
|
#3 | ||
New Member
Corinna
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
If your approach were successful, you should have been very suspicious about the result. Quote:
Conny |
|||
September 24, 2010, 03:55 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Liberis
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 16 |
Thanks conny,
I ve already realized that something important is missing from my approach with OpenFoam. Now I try to do my work with the classical FDTD adopting some AMR approaches. But I was wondering if openfoam could solve the Maxwell equation with the suggestion of Shankar, Hall et all for an Finite Volume Ttime domain CFD like solution. |
|
October 1, 2010, 11:43 |
|
#5 | |
Senior Member
Mirko Vukovic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 159
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
Taking one step & one component as an example, in cartesian coordinates, dE_x/dt will depend on (curl H)_x, all of which are known. Integrating this over a volume, this can be viewed that the (curl H)_x is the source term for E_x in that cell. I did not write the formulas in detail, but I don't see here a matrix solution problem here. Only evaluation of the source term (curl H), and updating the LHS (E). I consider myself an OF and numerical arts novice, but I wonder if the OP used a time step that is too large, or if he set up the initial conditions correctly. Mirko |
||
September 21, 2015, 13:47 |
Did you get a Solution???
|
#6 | |
New Member
Víctor Mendoza García
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
Can you show me an example (link, code, pdf, etc...) to understand how to apply "solves them component after component" ???? Thanks in advance, I need it in this moment to simulate a electromagnetic wave for my thesis. Best regards, Victor |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 06:36 |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 07:20 |
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end | xiuying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | August 27, 2013 16:33 |
time dependent inlet subroutine. HELP!!! | jimmer | Siemens | 4 | November 10, 2008 09:49 |
unsteady calcs in FLUENT | Sanjay Padhiar | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 31, 1999 13:32 |