|
[Sponsors] |
August 15, 2010, 17:32 |
bubbleFoam
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello Everyone. I am using bubbleFoam solver to simulate a 2-D bubble collumn, I have modified the mesh so it is a rectangular domain and the air is coming from a fraction of the bottom of the domain. I was wonderinf if anyone can explain what is the difference between 0 and 0.org directories in bubbleColumn example? Thank you.
|
|
August 15, 2010, 22:32 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Nima Samkhaniani
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tehran, Iran
Posts: 1,267
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 25 |
hi friend
0.org is the original folder which contains the initial condition for each variable but for better convergence they let the solver run and use other time directory as directory 0 and change directory 0 to 0.org!!!!!!! look in dictionary 0 you can see variables are non-uniform but in 0.org variables are uniform !!!!!!!!! so as conclusion in ur SITUATION 0.org doesn't play any role!!!!! |
|
August 15, 2010, 22:44 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16 |
Thank you for your reply. So I have got to get rid of all the values and just stick to the general initial conditions, am I right? My problem is that I have changed the mesh into a 2-D mesh which is basically three rectangulars attached to each other and the bubbles are rising from the mid rectangular. It works fine but I have lost the top air layer and I don't know why and how I can fix it.
|
|
August 16, 2010, 20:09 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16 |
I did but I am still missing the air layer on the top! Also have you got any idea on how to change the simulation from laminar to turbulent? I have turned on the turbulent option and selected k-epsilon method but am a bit lost on how to change the initial condition of k and epsilon. Thank you in advance for your help.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
interFoam / bubbleFoam to simulate an aerated tank | Meratb | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | November 6, 2020 12:45 |
Inputs for bubbleFoam | rans2009 | OpenFOAM | 0 | October 8, 2009 08:59 |
bubbleFoam | rans2009 | OpenFOAM | 3 | October 5, 2009 05:28 |
Lift force modeling in bubbleFoam | holger_marschall | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | December 10, 2007 16:24 |
BubbleFoam alpha equation | alberto | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | September 21, 2005 02:33 |