|
[Sponsors] |
July 8, 2010, 07:23 |
interFoam vs icoFoam on a single-phase case
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Emanuele
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 110
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi, i m trying to simulate a single phase flow normal to a flat plate and analyzing the forceCoeffs. I ran the case on interFoam (setting one single value of alpha on the entire field and as i see in log file it doesn't solve the alpha equation as i expected) and icoFoam. The result is different: what is the cause of this divergence ?? I ran the lid driven cavity case using the two codes but in that case the solutions are the same.
interFoam: maxCo && maxAlphaCo = 0.5/0.05 I attach the graph EDIT : using a constant deltaT in interFoam i obtain a solution equal to icoFoam's one Last edited by nuovodna; July 13, 2010 at 15:59. Reason: Problem solved |
|
May 1, 2014, 10:37 |
|
#2 | |
New Member
James Feng
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi,
I'm running into the similar issue of getting different results for a single phase flow case using the icofoam and interfoam solvers, when I tried to solve the problem of a gas jet perpendicularly impinging a plane with the same mesh. I wonder if anybody can explain what is wrong here. Thanks. fengjq Quote:
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
heat produced during single phase combustion | dace | CFX | 0 | January 9, 2009 13:42 |
Effect of pressure head on single phase simulation | sushil | FLUENT | 0 | November 12, 2008 05:24 |
Free surface boudary conditions with SOLA-VOF | Fan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | September 9, 2006 13:24 |
Two-phase/ Single phase mix flow | Reza | Main CFD Forum | 1 | August 6, 2003 07:36 |
Single Phase Swirling Flow Modelling with Structured and Unstructured Fluent | Daniel J. Suasnabar | FLUENT | 2 | January 18, 2000 03:53 |